고령자를 위한 거주지 외부환경 평가 - 대전시 거주 준고령자 이상을 대상으로 -

Abstract

Korea is rapidly becoming an aging society. This study aims to examine the existing conditions of outdoor living environments to assist a healthy lifestyle for senior citizens and to determine the most influential factor in a senior-friendly outdoor space as well as to suggest improvements in existing conditions focused on the prospective senior population. This study relied on two methods: a descriptive method of researching publications and related scholastic writings and an empirical study that included a survey of present conditions and interviews with the prospective seniors and senior citizens in Daejeon. Conditions of outdoor living environments for seniors were found to be more than adequate in general. But some factors evaluated as low must be carefully tailored for seniors. First, the study showed that seniors evaluated as highest the `use of a walkway` for a stroll and stayed outside for 1~2 hours at a time. Many vehicles parked in walkways were the most inconvenient factors in going for a walk. Second, the study showed that the evaluation of outdoor space was about average and `sociality` was evaluated as the lowest. Third, the study showed that men evaluated lower than women 4 items: `use and convenience of a wheelchair`, `night lighting`, `discrimination of signage at nighttime` and `trees`. Respondents above the age of 66 are more uncomfortable with items such as `slippery walking surface`, `stair handrail`, `discrimination of signage at nighttime` and `direction of apartment complex` while respondents above the age of 80 are more uncomfortable with items of `slippery walking surface`, `stair handrail` and `discrimination of signage at nighttime`. Fourth, the evaluation by existing housing patterns was statistically significant in 20 of 22 evaluated items. This means that residents in apartment complex evaluated as high these items in general. In this study, existing outdoor living environments for the elderly did not display any immediately serious issues in the overall evaluation items. Assuming, however, that the aging population will quickly increase in the next ten years, items which are evaluated as low in descriptive statistics and items which give inconvenience to the elderly above the age of 80 in particular will need to be the first areas to be improved.