Abstract

Objectives In this study, the subjectivity of professors and students is the most common among social welfare subjects, and it is meaningful to analyze and evaluate whether face-to-face classes can be supplemented by using problem-based learning (PBL) in non-face-to-face classes due to COVID-19.
 Methods To this end, external and fellow professors and researchers analyzed and evaluated the class videos, lecture plans, and materials of Social Welfare Ethics and Philosophy, and conducted in-depth interviews with students on class evaluation.
 Results As a result of conducting ‘social welfare ethics and philosophy’ classes using blended learning as a non- face-to-face method with COVID-19, external, peer, and researcher evaluations were high, and satisfaction with their own considerations due to students' understanding and discussion of subjects was higher than face-to-face classes.
 Conclusions Even if face-to-face classes are converted after COVID-19, students will be able to improve their satisfaction by using blended methods of videos and zoom classes for students who inevitably did not participate in face-to-face classes and problem-based learning methods that help them logically present and advise others.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call