Abstract
Purpose: the actual and necessary legislative constitutionalization of traditional values, which include both the “morality” originally enshrined in the Constitution and the “historical truth” and “traditional family values” named during the constitutional reform of 2020, has not been developed in modern Russian constitutionalism, and therefore its implementation and harmonization with the freedom of creativity. Methodology: in the process of writing the article, the following methods were used: analysis, synthesis, system approach, formal legal. Conclusions: the current regulatory regulation shows a lack of legal protection of public morality and traditional family values. The development of legal protection of traditional values can be directed towards the legislative expansion of the grounds for interference in the cultural activities of citizens and organizations in order to harmonize freedom of creativity with constitutional values, as well as to empower regional and local public authorities to monitor compliance with the priorities of cultural development determined by the President of the Russian Federation. Scientific and practical significance: the conducted research makes it possible to supplement and improve the existing legal regulation in the field of cultural activities. The conclusions of this study can be used to amend and supplement regulatory legal acts regulating the powers of regional and municipal public authorities in the implementation of state cultural policy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.