Abstract
In this paper, three multi-view registration methods for point clouds, MAICP (Motion Averaging Iterative Closest Points), LUM with 6 DoF (Lu and Milios style SLAM with 6 DoF), and IOM (Improved Optimization-on-a-Manifold), are compared. For each method, three types of correspondence computation approaches: point-point, point-plane and point-curved surface, are implemented and the performance of the multi-view registration methods based on each correspondence computation type is analyzed and compared with real examples. To reduce the accumulative error caused by pairwise registration, multi-view registration should be applied. We also suggest which type of correspondence method, and the multi-view registration method should be applied to obtain the least error and registration time.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Korean Journal of Computational Design and Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
