Abstract
The purpose of this study was to verify the validity of wearable devices for estimating energy consumption during physical activity for sports club members in their 20s. In this study, absolute error and relative error were calculated to verify the error in the estimation of energy consumption between measurement tools, and repeated measured ANOVA analysis of variance was performed to verify the difference in the estimation of energy consumption. If there was a statistically significant difference in the repeated measured ANOVA analysis of variance, the dependent t test was performed to verify the difference in the mean value. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to verify the relative relationship of energy consumption estimates between measurement tools, and Bland-Altman plot was applied to confirm the error size between the measurement tool and the reference tool. As a result of the study, it was found that SenseWear Pro3(SWP) overestimates energy consumption during low-intensity physical activity and underestimates energy consumption during moderate-intensity and high-intensity physical activity. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the energy expenditure estimates of SWP and the energy expenditure estimates of the reference tool during moderate-intensity physical activity. Also, as a result of Pearson
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.