Abstract

The paper argues that Leo Tolstoy uses the national disaster paradigm represented in the epic novel War and Peace to depict the relatively peaceful time in his novel Resurrection as he raises the question of the growing crisis in Russia and the problem of the survival of Russian people. One of the central images of this latter novel is the image of the land. Its function is to support a system of Tolstoy’s antitheses that in his late period, aimed not only to rebuke the existing order but also to create a large-scale image of national unity. The image of the land in Resurrection ties together thematic and ideological strata of the novel that manifest its epic features. I argue that although Tolstoy abandoned his initial intention to make the acute social and political landrelated issue the center of his work, the motif nevertheless remains relevant. The image of the land is ciphered in the description of the severity of prisoners’ life and Nekhlyudov’s attempts to help the prisoners. Moreover, it is closely connected with all spheres of Russian life, it is a marker of Nekhlyudov’s spiritual growth that allows not only place the character’s “resurrection” within specific realities of historical time, but also presents it in the traditions of Christian anthropology. The image of the land allots the novel with trans-historical meaning and contributes to the implementation of the religious consciousness in Tolstoy’s work.

Highlights

  • The paper argues that Leo Tolstoy uses the national disaster paradigm represented in the epic novel War and Peace to depict the relatively peaceful time in his novel Resurrection as he raises the question of the growing crisis in Russia and the problem of the survival of Russian people

  • The image of the land is ciphered in the description of the severity of prisoners’ life and Nekhlyudov’s attempts to help the prisoners. It is closely connected with all spheres of Russian life, it is a marker of Nekhlyudov’s spiritual growth that allows place the character’s “resurrection” within specific realities of historical time, and presents it in the traditions of Christian anthropology

  • Образ земли в романе многозначен, вступает в различные смысловые отношения с другими ключевыми компонентами изобразительности, способствуя организации таких свойств и признаков эпического романа, как особая целостность и тотальность художественного мира, изображение народной жизни, наличие религиозного сознания, объективность повествования, широкий охват событий, преодоление столкновения между личностью и обществом, масштабность конфликтов, наличие точек зрения и голосов героев, повторяемость событий, свойственная для прецедентной картины мира

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Несмотря на то что роман «Воскресение» написан на материале современной автору действительности, в этом произведении нет внешней угрозы, перед которой оказалась бы Россия (как во время Крымской войны в Севастопольских рассказах и тем более во время русско-французской войны в «Войне и мире»), Толстой подводит читателя к проблеме нарастания в России страшного кризиса, к проблеме сохранения национальной целостности и выживания народа. В художественном мире эпического романа «Воскресение», как и в романе-эпопее «Война и мир», русская земля нуждается в защите.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call