Антикризові інструменти відновлення та розвитку громад у воєнний і повоєнний час

Abstract

The aim of the article is to study and analyze the scientific and methodological approaches and experience of managers in communities regarding the process of recovery and development, as well as to formulate recommendations for the use of the most effective anti-crisis tools for the recovery and development of communities during the wartime and in the post-war period, which are based on the principles of sustainability, efficiency and optimal quality of service provision, as the war has become a crucial determining test of territorial communities of Ukraine for institutional capacity, organizational readiness, resource economic endurance and potential of personnel. As a result of the analysis of scientific works of numerous scientists, it was found that there is no unified approach to the selection and application of tools for the recovery and development of communities in the scientific literature. As a result of the study, anti-crisis tools for the recovery and socioeconomic development of communities during the wartime and in the post-war period are systematized and it is proposed to classify them into institutional tools, financial-economic and socioeconomic tools. The advantages of using each of the anti-crisis tools for the recovery and socioeconomic development of communities during the wartime and in the post-war period are analyzed. Comprehensive recommendations for the effective use of anti-crisis tools for the recovery and development of communities during the wartime and in the post-war period are provided, taking into account the successful experience of cooperation during the wartime between Ukrainian managers and international partners. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the conceptual substantiation of the effectiveness of the use of anti-crisis tools for the recovery and socioeconomic development of communities during the wartime and in the post-war period, the essence of which lies in the synergistic projection of the strategic development of communities on the principles of consistency and integrity, efficiency and sustainability, multivariance and irreversibility. Prospects for further research in this direction are to study the experience of comprehensive operational response of local authorities together with representatives of civil society to situational challenges associated with direct hostilities and post-war consequences. Purposeful, albeit gradual, movement towards solving the problem of recovery and development of communities during the wartime and in the post-war period is the basis for the recovery of economic and other spheres of public life in Ukraine.