Abstract

This article is devoted to the role of the famous Russian archaeologist Mikhail Fedorovich Kosarev in the process of studying the Irmen culture. Analysis is given to the works of the scientist that he wrote in the 1960s and 1990s, which dealt with various issues related to the Irmen problematic (the origin of the culture, its component composition, distribution area, chronology, interaction with other cultures, historical destinies etc). The article shows how the researcher developed his views on a number of problems of the late Bronze Age and the transition from Bronze to Iron. Separate analysis is given to his ideas expressed in the 1960s based on his own field research and a few then scientific works of Siberian archaeologists. The article considers the change in the views of M.F. Kosarev on the evolution of the Irmen culture in the 1970s and 1990s in the framework of the formation of an integral concept of development of West Siberian cultures and communities of the Bronze Age. An attempt is made to trace the transformation of M.F. Kosarev's ideas on the main issues studied and to show how his many years of research influenced the perception of the experts of the Irmen antiquities.

Highlights

  • Рассматривается значение известного российского археолога Михаила Фёдоровича Косарева в процессе изучения ирменской культуры

  • Косарева по основным изучаемым вопросам и показать, как его многолетние исследования повлияли на восприятие специалистами ирменских древностей

  • This article is devoted to the role of the famous Russian archaeologist Mikhail Fedorovich Kosarev in the process of studying the Irmen culture

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Рассматривается значение известного российского археолога Михаила Фёдоровича Косарева в процессе изучения ирменской культуры. Косарев обобщил материалы эпохи поздней бронзы и переходного времени от бронзы к железу Среднего Приобья, выделив еловскую и молчановскую культуры [3, с. Территорию ирменской культуры специалист ограничивал в тот период Нижним Притомьем, Новосибирским и южной частью Томского Приобья, что соответствовало степени изученности археологических памятников эпохи поздней бронзы в 1960-е гг.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.