Варикоцеле и репродуктивная функция: возможности коррекции патозооспермии (данные проспективного сравнительного исследования)

Abstract

Varicocele does not always lead to infertility; varicocelectomy does not always improve sperm. Objective to evaluate the standardized effect (Es) of nutrient therapy, microsurgical and laparoscopic varicocelectomy for pathozoospermia. Study design a multicenter case-control study with stratified randomization. Materials and methods data of a clinical and laboratory examination of patients with clinical varicocele over a 3-month period in the groups: A) the observation/control group (n=33), B) the group treated with nutrients (n=63), C) the group of patients after microsurgical varicocelectomy with a subinguinal mini access (n=86), D) the group of patients following laparoscopic surgery (n=36). The ejaculate was evaluated according to WHO-2010, DNA fragmentation by chromatin dispersion in an agarose gel. Results After 3 months, varicocelectomy leads to an increase in sperm concentration and motility: the median of the total number of progressively motile spermatozoa in the ejaculate in A is +0.4 million; B - +1.9 million; C - +17.1 million (p 0.05). The laparoscopic surgery demonstrated higher Es than microsurgical operation (Es=0.70 and 0.44, with 0.29 in the patient receiving nutrients and 0.22 in the patients in the control group) Conclusion Varicocelectomy significantly improves sperm quality in 2/3 of cases, including 5.5% decrease in DNA fragmentation. Nutrient therapy produces similar DNA fragmentation improvement. Further research is necessary to identify who really requires varicocelectomy and who does not.