전후 아시아에서 ‘중립’의 이몽과 비동맹운동 - 한국전쟁 종전에서 인도 요인을 중심으로

Abstract

This study discusses how Asian factors worked in the course of the Korean War and before and after it. I tried to raise it by focusing on the Indian Factor. In the harsh conditions of the violent post-war reorganization of the post-war order in Asia, where the Cold War has been devastated by the Indonesian War, Indochina War, and the Korean War, Prime Minister Nehru of India tried not to follow the path of historical misfortune in Asia again. Thus, he took the lead in advocating for the problem of restructuring Asia led by Asia. It has a huge impact across Asia, which was struggling with the task of forming a modern nation-state through decolonization.BRHere, the Indian factor can be summarized as the representation of Asia as a peace zone, the submission of neutralism as a response to the globalization of the Cold War, and the formation of a new sphere of influence through Asian regionalization as a non-aligned movement. Nehru’s position was raised in the course of the Korean War as a paradox of the Asian peace zone, raising the question of the transformation of war into an international war, and ending the war. Nehru led the Asian peace process through ceaseless mediation e orts through the United Nations and solidarity among Asian countries. Therefore, this study considered the question of how Nehru’s neutralism as a discourse on Asian peace was carried out in the Korean War, and how it resulted in the non-aligned movement. And I tried to explain that it is the phase that drives the post-Cold War from the early stage of the global Cold War as an Asian intervention by Asia.