Концепция «справедливого города» Сьюзан Файнштейн на примере рекреационных зон города Астаны

Abstract

Susan Fainstein, while not using the term "just city" as her precinct, is still one of the most profound questions about justice in cities. It seeks to answer the question: “How can we create and sustain democratic cities that embrace the diverse forms, abilities and aspirations of residents, where they can live fulfilling lives free from marginalization and oppression?” Susan Fainstein sees the problem of urban justice in the tension between development and redistribution, where the collective good takes precedence over the individual. She believes that sources of positive change must come from both social movement and social action strategies. Using Susan Fainstein's methodology, it is possible to analyze whether Astana's recreational spaces comply with the principles of a “just city” in the context of their general accessibility and inclusiveness. The study aims to expand the discourse on urban justice and explore possible proposals for urban planning. Thus, Susan Fainstein's methodology becomes a tool for assessing the extent to which Astana reflects the principles of fair and equitable urban space through the prism of recreational areas. The article analyzes the problem of urban equality, emphasizing the need for a balance between the development and redistribution of recreational areas in the city.