Abstract

Purchasing tickets for water park is defined as an contract or an agreement was made between a water sports consumer and water sports supplier. With this reason, the process which gather the opinions of consumers or agreement is the most important for this business. However, a current issue what a water park supplier collected personal information agreement and exception clauses in a paper without any notices was discovered and just become a controversy in legal. Therefore, any preventive policies or countermeasures was not existed become another noisy controversy. This research was aimed to approach the tort case of the water park case and micro analyse it in the view of Korean Law, Constitutions, Criminal Law, Civil Law and The Act on Fair Indication and Advertisement of Korea. The results were as follows; First, the actions of water park and consumer is defined as an utilization contract. Second, the duty to notify of water park must be easy to approach and understand to customers, but the actions of the case was not. Third, the actions for the exception clauses of the water park is not to acknowledge the effect legally. Lastly, the customers could demand compensation for the injury for the tort of obligations regards duty to notify, liability for explanation and exception clauses. End of the paper, several discussions were suggested for follow up studies.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call