Abstract

Drawing from the examples of newly formed and former democracies, the article examines the directions which the transformation of this political concept has taken in context of the expansion of the public sphere and changes in how the democratic process is implemented. Attention is drawn to how the transition of the forefront of political life from traditional centers of its “distribution”- governments, parliaments, and municipal authorities, to the “fatherland” of the public sphere and media of varying quality has become one of the reasons for the accelerated proliferation of politics of the populist variety. The rise of media in Ukraine, where it falls under complete ownership of centers of oligarchy, provides grounds for mentioning a special type of “oligarchic democracy”, which serendipitously exploits the opportunities offered by populism. At the same time, the examples of democratic crises in other nations have become widespread enough, so that they encourage casting doubt on crucial democratic processes, including elections: electoral democracy has formally taken place, although it hasn’t fulfilled its essential function of including the citizenry in making key social decisions. Researchers assert that media is not the only source that breathes life into populist politics as a means to seize power. This carries the threat of destroying the very institutions through which the democratic form of government is realized. Transitional democracies are also subjected to the erosion of populism through problems with asserting the supremacy of law and difficulties with establishing liberal market economics, which should have been synchronized with their political transformation. Authors refer to the fact, that populism is a problem shared by governments with diverse histories of democratic life. Behind democracy always lurks the threat of false self-rule, which can lead to the rise of new authoritarian regimes under the guise of populist conservative declarations and national protectionism. Russia could become an example of this, after its wholly democratic process of voting on amendments to its national constitution, which is expected during 2020. Controversy in equal or greater measure has also surrounded the future of Great Britain after Brexit.

Highlights

  • П M ния, в частности кризис либеральной представительной демократии, демонстрируют неизбежность перемен общественной и политической жизни стран «коллективного Запада» и сигнализируют о неизбежных измене-.

  • S ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8601-8786 C Эволюция типов демократии и угроза популизма для транзитивных государств: медиа аспект остановка проблемы.

  • В статье авторы обращают внимание на то, что для политиков популистского толка важным есть взаимодействия из лояльными к ним медиа во время прихода к власти.

Read more

Summary

Introduction

П M ния, в частности кризис либеральной представительной демократии, демонстрируют неизбежность перемен общественной и политической жизни стран «коллективного Запада» и сигнализируют о неизбежных измене-. S ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8601-8786 C Эволюция типов демократии и угроза популизма для транзитивных государств: медиа аспект остановка проблемы. В статье авторы обращают внимание на то, что для политиков популистского толка важным есть взаимодействия из лояльными к ним медиа во время прихода к власти.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call