Abstract
The paper analyzes some significant aspects of the problem of using the comparative method in legal research, as well as attracting foreign experience as a source for expanding and deepening knowledge about the nature of problems in legal science and practice. The main thesis summarizing the results of the study is the need for a critical attitude to com-pared objects. It implies the analysis of a wide range of theoretical and methodological, socio-historical, cultural and other important points of relevant doc-trinal and conceptual ideas in foreign experience. Such an approach makes it possible to avoid arbi-trary interpretations and obvious distortions of legal issues. At the same time, it is necessary to take into account the ideological nature of Western legal sci-ence, which is closed in on itself, and various disci-plinary and methodological bases for analyzing fun-damental legal problems.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
