Abstract
In the article we consider a complex indicator of region natural resource potential modeling and forecasting quality improvement using different machine learning models. Problem under consideration importance is determined by the fact that the models traditionally used for these purposes demonstrate either low quality, or high configuration and parameters evaluation difficulty. The aim of the study is determination of machine learning models that provide the optimal values of various modeling quality metrics. Materials and methods. For this study purposes we considered the multiple linear regression, decision tree, random forest, gradient boosting and multilayer perceptron mo¬dels. We used the determination coefficient R2, the root mean square error of modeling RMSE, the average absolute error of modeling MAE, and the relative error of prediction for 1 and 2 time intervals as quality metrics. This study is based on data of the complex indicator of the Perm Region natural resource potential and the system of its determining factors in the time interval from 2001 to 2018. We evaluate models and calculate quality metrics using Pandas and Scikit-learn Python libraries in Jupiter Notebook environment. Results. According to our research the classical multiple linear regression model demonstrates the worst results for all quality metrics under consideration. The decision tree model demonstrates determination coefficient maximum value and minimum root mean square error and mean absolute error. Minimum relative forecasting error for 2017 is provided by the gradient boosting model, for 2018 – by the multilayer perceptron model. Conclusion. Our study allows us to affirm that nonlinear machine learning models for the task of region natural resource potential modeling and forecasting demonstrate better approximating and predictive properties compared to multiple linear regression and thus can be used to improve the quality of natural resource management.
Highlights
Модели машинного обучения в задаче прогнозирования природно-ресурсного потенциала Пермского края как показателя в целом, так и его составляющих посвящено достаточно большое число отечественных и зарубежных исследований
In the article we consider a complex indicator of region natural resource potential modeling and forecasting quality improvement using different machine learning models
For this study purposes we considered the multiple linear regression, decision tree, random forest, gradient boosting and multilayer perceptron models
Summary
Алгоритмы машинного обучения с учителем классифицируются в зависимости от используемого математического аппарата следующим образом1:. Для решения задачи прогнозирования ПРП Пермского края выберем алгоритмы различных типов. Примером линейного алгоритма машинного обучения является обычная множественная линейная регрессия, дерево принятия решений входит в группу нелинейных алгоритмов, модели случайного леса и градиентного бустинга – примеры ансамблевых алгоритмов, а многослойный персептрон является нейронной сетью. Коротко охарактеризуем каждый из перечисленных выше алгоритмов обучения с учителем
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Computer Technologies, Automatic Control & Radioelectronics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.