Abstract

The present article aims to examine, and provide an alternative vision of, Korean studies on chŏpkyŏng and chŏpch’okchidae. These two are Korean terms that, arguably, correspond to a contact zone that Mary Louise Pratt coined for her inquiries into linguistics, literacy and Euro-imperialism. In this context, this article undertakes five tasks as follows. First, it disambiguates the term ‘contact zone.’ Second, on this basis, it gives a more detailed explication of the theoretical, substantive and methodological features of Pratt’s inquiry into Euro-imperialism. Third, in the light of Pratt’s studies on contact zones and Euro-imperialism, it critically examines Korean studies on contact zones. In so doing, this article illustrates that a large body of the Korean literature is, indeed and albeit to vaying degrees, irrelevant to Pratt’s critique of imperialism and/or even appropriates her concepts in an improper fashion. Fourth, in this respect, it suggests a few alternative research topics, inter alia, with regard to the relatively complex relations of imperialism in East Asia. Finally, it indicates a few (meta-)theoretical issues for conducting a theoretically informed investigation into East Asian and Korean contact zones.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.