Abstract

The article examines a specific metaliterary motif of the confrontation between ‘the author’ and the character. In this motif, both ‘the author’ and the character are portrayed as characters of the plot of the fictional world. The article analyses the emergence of the motif in modernist literature which subverts the realist poetics of the author’s omniscience. The author of the article employs the term ruman to refer to the novel genre where the author and the character enjoy equal rights. The term was first introduced by Miguel de Unamuno whose Mist (1914) was the first example of this version of metareflexive narrative. The article traces the development of the motif in modernist, postmodernist, and recently published contemporary novels. The differences in depicting of the relationship between the author and the character are explicated by reconstruction of the aesthetic and philosophical context of the time and the polemics with the dominating concepts of the Subject. Additionally, the article examines variations of the motif both in highbrow and mass literature focusing on such rumanistic pieces as novels by K. Vaginov, J. Fowles, V. Pelevin, L. Binet.

Highlights

  • the character are portrayed as characters of the plot

  • The article analyses the emergence of the motif in modernist literature which subverts the realist poetics of the author's omniscience

  • The author of the article employs the term ruman to refer to the novel genre where the author

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ключевые слова: металитературность, метароман, «руман», сюжет противостояния автора и героя, автор как персонаж, М. И сам автор – Мигель Унамуно – соглашается с таким жанровым наименованием: это роман, но такой, в котором против автора «восстают его собственные создания» [Там же: 47].

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call