Abstract

The article analyzes domestic tax legislation of the Republic of Armenia and main countries investing in Armenia in combination with double tax treaties concluded between Armenia and these countries. The aim of such analysis is to find out the riskiest double tax treaties in terms of tax treaty shopping potential. Research approach is based on assessment of indicator characterizing country position in the global investment and capital flows comparing to the main countries investing in Armenia. This indicator is determined as ratio of foreign direct investment to gross domestic product. Based on this assessment countries-investors were divided to two groups according to the level of tax base erosion risk. The article further presents the detailed analysis of national legislation and double tax treaties with these countries. Moreover, the authors discuss international experience of developing legal approaches towards addressing the issue of tax treaty abuse, such as Principle Purpose Test, Limitation of Benefits Rule and Concept of Beneficial Owner of Income. The authors also analyze international experience of formulating the criteria of assessment of necessary conditions for obtaining tax treaty benefits. These approaches can be used for development of international tax policy in the Republic of Armenia with the aim of defending its sovereign tax base and creating certain and sustainable business and tax rules for foreign investors and domestic taxpayers expanding overseas.

Highlights

  • main countries investing in Armenia in combination

  • with double tax treaties concluded between Armenia

  • The aim of such analysis is to find out the riskiest double tax treaties in terms

Read more

Summary

Нет налога у источника выплаты на проценты

Анализ ДИДН, заключенных между Республикой Армения и странами с повышенным риском размывания базы с точки зрения возможностей для налоговой экономии при выплате основных видов инвестиционных пассивных доходов представлен в табл. Таблица 3 Анализ ДИДН (при наличии) между Арменией и основными странами-инвесторами с повышенным риском размывания налоговой базы. Что касается ДИДН со странами — традиционными финансовыми посредниками, такими как Нидерланды, Люксембург и Швейцария, то следует отметить возможность применения нулевых ставок при выплате процентов по банковским кредитам из этих стран и пониженную ставку для доходов в виде роялти. 4. Структурирование инвестиций в экономику Республики Армения через компании и структуры в обозначенных выше юрисдикциях может осуществляться как иностранными инвесторами, желающими вложить свой капитал в Армению, так и местными налогоплательщиками (компаниями и физическими лицами), которые используют указанные юрисдикции для целей налоговой оптимизации. Таблица 6 Упрощенное правило ограничения льгот (Simplified Limitation of Benefits rule)

Некоммерческая организация
Findings
16. International Tax Structures in the BEPS Era
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.