Abstract
The article attempts to identify and analyze some formal and substantive aspects of modern historiographical discourse on the problems of Russian philosophy. Using a wide range of sources, the article conventionally identifies such “languages” of representation of the problems of Russian philosophy as “artistic philosophizing”, “publicistic philosophizing”, “religious philosophizing”, “media philosophizing” and others. On the basis of the meanings presented in the texts of the representatives of each of the selected directions, the substantive as-pects of the modern historiographical discourse of the problems of Russian philosophy are analyzed. The fol-lowing universal “themes” of historiographical discourse are outlined: what is the essence of Russian philoso-phy; what is the meaning of the “Russian idea”; what is the specificity of Russian philosophy in the space of the world philosophical discourse, etc. The features of the representation of the content of the indicated questions in “languages” are presented, different in formal characteristics of “philosophizing”, taking into account the ref-erence to the texts of such “iconic” figures in the modern artistic, educational and academic philosophical space as A.A. Voznesensky, F.I. Girenok, A.A. Huseynov, S.D. Dovlatov, N.S. Mikhalkov, V.A. Sidur, A.D. Sukhov and others.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
