미술 창작 분야의 학습윤리 교육을 위한 미술 표절 논란 사례 분석 연구

Abstract

This study is a basic study for learning ethics education in the art creating field, and to understand the types of plagiarism and considerations by type that can be used in learning ethics education in the art creating field, cases of plagiarism in the art field were considered. Through case-by-case categorization, similarity judgment requirements embodied in the art creating field were derived. As a result of the study, first, it was confirmed that it is necessary to consider whether there is a possibility that the same expression and method occur repeatedly in the type of ‘significantly intentional similarity’ that can be seen as plagiarism. Second, in the type of 'similarity due to the identity of the object to be expressed', it was confirmed that it was necessary to first consider whether it was similar due to the factual description of the same object and whether it was an area of universal ideas. Third, in the 'similarity due to the identity of materials, it should be considered whether it is a problem raised simply by the use of the same material and the use of materials of simplified abstract forms. Fourth, it was confirmed that in the type of “similarity due to the universality of objects and compositions,” the possibility of proof of key creative elements existing in previous works should be considered first. Fifth, in the type of 'similarity due to appropriation', the judgment on whether a new meaning of creation is established compared to the original work and whether it is intentional and public should be considered first. Sixth, in the type of 'transformed similarity', it has been confirmed that a careful approach is needed considering the context of the author, focusing on overall concept and feeling-oriented judgment.