Abstract
In the article the content of the draft reform of the arbitration court, prepared on behalf of Emperor Alexander I G.R. Derzhavin is analyzed in detail. As sources, both published and archival materials were used. The attitude of contemporaries and descendants to this project was ambiguous. Lawyers controversially evaluated the project of the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General of the Senate. Many of them drew attention to the complexity of the proposed methods of arbitration of legal disputes. It is noted that for the beginning of the XIX century this project of reorganization of the arbitration court was rather bold, as it allowed publicity, wordlessness, openness of legal proceedings. In many ways Derzhavin’s proposals were ahead of time. The conclusion is drawn about the relevance of the project in the context of modern court reform and the expansion of the practice of alternative dispute resolution methods.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
