Abstract

The paper presents the features of terminology and classification of fish products for food and non-food purposes in the nomenclature of various levels: national (All-Russian product classifier by economic activity (RCPA 2) and international (The Foreign Economic Activity Commodity Nomenclature of the Customs Union (FEACN of the CU). In the course of the study there was conducted a comparison of the codes of fish products within the framework of the existing methodology for the formation of transition keys. In the classification of fish products in FEACN of CU there has been stated the imperfection of methodological and information base, illogicality and ambiguity associated with the lack of clear definitions of terms in EAEU Commodity Nomenclature for Foreign Economic Activity and in regulatory documents, with a discrepancy between concepts adopted in commodity research and international commodity nomenclature, as well as the lack of development of fish product identification for customs regulation in terms of specificity of the consumer properties of fish products. Correspondence of the codes of the international commodity nomenclature (UCN FEA EAEU) and the Russian classifier (RCPA 2) is recorded in the table reflecting the possible correlation options for the codes of the classifiers in relation to certain types of fish products (fish meal, fish glue, fish gelatin, fish roe), which are set by transition keys. There has been required the development of a unified approach to the interpretation of fish product codes under the FEACN of CU, as well as the development of unified terminology for omitting
 a subjective assessment in the analysis of consumer properties and product indicators.

Highlights

  • The paper presents the features of terminology and classification of fish products for food and non-food purposes in the nomenclature of various levels: national (All-Russian product classifier by economic activity (RCPA 2) and international (The Foreign Economic Activity Commodity Nomenclature of the Customs Union (FEACN of the CU)

  • In the course of the study there was conducted a comparison of the codes of fish products within the framework of the existing methodology for the formation of transition keys

  • Термины и определения: национальный стандарт Российской Федерации

Read more

Summary

КЛАССИФИКАЦИОННЫХ СИСТЕМАХ

Астраханский государственный технический университет, Астрахань, Российская Федерация. Рассмотрены особенности терминологии и классификации рыбной продукции пищевого и непищевого назначения в номенклатурах различного уровня: национальной (Общероссийский классификатор продукции по видам экономической деятельности (ОКПД 2)) и международной (Товарная номенклатура внешнеэкономической деятельности Евразийского экономического союза (ТН ВЭД ЕАЭС)). При классификации рыбной продукции при использовании первой части правила No 1 следует составить «линейку» из разделов и групп, к которым продукция имеет какое-либо отношение, учитывая при этом все возможные направления обработки и переработки рыбного сырья, использования полуфабрикатов и готовой продукции, а также совокупность основополагающих характеристик (например, вид упаковки, процентное содержание жира, белка и др.). На основании статистических данных агентства Евростат Комиссии Европейского союза и данных Минэкономразвития РФ и существующей методики формирования переходных ключей (сопоставительных таблиц) в отношении отдельных видов рыбной продукции было установлено соответствие кодов международной товарной номенклатуры (ТН ВЭД ЕАЭС) и Общероссийского классификатора (ОКПД 2) (табл.)

ТН ВЭД ЕАЭС
Рыбная мука непищевого назначения
Икра рыб Заменители икры
СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.