ЗАСТОСУВАННЯ МОДЕЛІ РАША ДЛЯ АНАЛІЗУ ШКАЛИ ОЦІНЮВАННЯ КОМПЕТЕНТНОСТІ ЕКСПЕРТІВ У СФЕРІ ОСВІТИ

Abstract

The results of the study of the scale for assessing the competence of experts in higher education using the Rusсh model are presented in the article. Initial expert data was processed with using special software. This model uses special diagnostic features and special graphical features. One statistic focuses on the overall performance of the item or person, and the other covers rare events and unexpected events. The scale of the consistent response of each person to each element (Rusch scale) has the properties of interval scale. The results of the transformation of input raw data by criteria and experts into Rusch measurements are presented. The analysis of the evaluation results showed that the selected scale of criteria for the evaluation of experts meets the established requirements for the Rusch model. Analyzing the input data for this model allows you to verify that the added results in the data are justified by what is called a data-matching test. The values obtained for the criteria used and the evaluated experts are within the established limits. The results of the assessment of the competence of education experts using the Rusch model are analyzed. Comparison of the results of the experts’ evaluation with the results of their evaluation by other methods showed their high correlation. The application of the evaluation method considered and other known method sources has yielded almost the same results. Most experts were ranked almost equally. All the least competent experts are also identified when using the Rush model. The results showed that the Rush model could be used to analyze the scale of competence assessment of experts in higher education.The analysis of the results showed that the selected scale of criteria for the evaluation of experts meets the established requirements for the Rush model. The measurement data obtained by the Rush model allowed us to calculate the established statistics for both the criteria and the experts evaluated.