Abstract
The article is devoted to the implementation of the principles of competitiveness and equality of parties in civil proceedings when appointing forensic examinations. The author notes that the current legal regulation does not properly ensure their observance, considers the problem through specific examples from judicial practice. It is concluded that the courts should carry out a number of preparatory measures before the appointment of forensic examinations, motivate the expediency of appointing a repeated or additional examination, as well as rejecting the arguments of the parties. The best form of expressing the position of the court should be considered a reasoned ruling that can be appealed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
