Abstract
The article highlights and analyzes the problems of criminal and administrative legislation related to deviations from the principles of consistency and fairness of law. The present article delves into the consideration of the actual problem associated with the peculiarities of differentiation of legal responsibility for falsification of vari-ous evidence in criminal cases and cases of administrative offenses. The author analyzed the current legisla-tion establishing administrative and criminal liability for falsification of the specified evidence, distinguished the features and problems of regulation and differentiation of these types of legal liability for the committing these unlawful acts. The work uses dialectical, analytical, comparative legal and other methods. Based on the con-ducted research, the author formulated specific conclusions and proposals aimed at improving the regulation of liability for falsification of evidence in an administrative offense case.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
