Abstract

In this article, we aim to analyse the peculiarities of the interactions between the text and image taking two compilations as examples – the “Ship of fools” and the “Blue barge”. We will start from the very beginning, when they started taking their shape in the late medieval times until the Renaissance when they underwent some changes. Both compilations had been shaped by H. Teichner and J. van Oestvoren in their poems of the early 15th century. However, the “ship of fools” underwent a considerable transformation in the humanistic culture. In the speech of J. Gall as well as in the eponym poem by S. Brant it turned from the image with a strong moralistic bias into a symbol of universal Folly and madness. Later Erasmus of Rotterdam in his “Praise of Folly” will refine the idea of Folly – Moria – that rules over the world. Illustrations for the “Ship of fools” underlined the universal character of the Folly as far as only jesters and not the ordinary people were depicted on the woodcuts. The “blue barge” did not undergo such a substantial change. It was not included in the “big narratives” of the humanists and thereby remained in the semantic limits of the “bürgermoral”. Nevertheless, it did go beyond the framework of the popular culture. Its way to the “high culture” passed through the artworks by H. Bosch, P. van der Heyden and P. Bruegel the Elder. Painters visualized not just existing carnival practices, but also features of the burger and patrician ethics, which enriched the construct of the “blue barge” and popularized it among different strata of the early modern Netherlandish society.

Highlights

  • In this article, we aim to analyse the peculiarities of the interactions between the text and image taking two compilations as examples – the “Ship of fools” and the “Blue barge”

  • Later Erasmus of Rotterdam in his “Praise of Folly” will refine the idea of Folly – Moria – that rules over the world

  • Illustrations for the “Ship of fools” underlined the universal character of the Folly as far as only jesters and not the ordinary people were depicted on the woodcuts

Read more

Summary

Стефанія Ковбасюк

The “Ship Of Fools” and the “Blue Barge”: Popular Constructs, Humanistic Thought and Visuality. The “blue barge” did not undergo such a substantial change It was not included in the “big narratives” of the humanists and thereby remained in the semantic limits of the “bürgermoral”. В статті ми звернемось до аналізу двох популярних конструктів – «корабля дурнів» та «блакитного човна», в чомусь синонімічних, але не рівних один одному, та їх рецепції в гуманістичних практиках та візуальності. А наразі коротко зупинимося на походженні образу корабля, зокрема, «корабля дурнів», образу, який став одним з ключових в культурі країн Північної Європи XVI століття. 217] під час засідання в університеті Хейдельберга, який очолював друг Бранта і Галла – Вімпфелінг. Твір Бранта, таким чином, є, якоюсь мірою, компіляцією всього того, що було написане й побачене ним до цього, але, в той же час, на його. У самому конструкті виявилася особлива семантика блакитного (blauwe) – як кольору обману у всіх його проявах (від навмисного обману когось до самообману)

Для прикладу досить згадати
Список джерел та літератури
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call