Abstract
This article deals with the history of empirical sociological research in pre-revolutionaryRussia. Analyzed is the use of a social “portrayal” method in the study of the political elite in order to identify the peculiarities of Russian electorate's behavior at municipal and national political elections at the turn of the 20th century. Considered are works by Russian publicists such as N. Borodin, A. Smirnov and G. Shreider, who adhered to the following methodological principle: social characteristics of the elite contain important information on the electoral choice of the population, determining who and how, according to the electorate, is fit to represent their interests in government structures.The article also demonstrates how the authors used the emerging national electoral statistics to identify social groups within the parliamentary block, studying certain qualities of those elected such as age, education, property, status, position in the power hierarchy, etc. Comparing the obtained results made it possible to draw conclusions as to the voters' motives and attitudes, as well as to the peculiarities of the social representation of elites. Based upon the conducted analysis, it is concluded that Russian empirical sociology of elites has deep historical roots.
Highlights
Однако малоизвестен тот факт, что использование социального «портретирования» элиты в отечественных эмпирических исследованиях имеет длительную историю и использовалось еще в дореволюционный период
В этом плане эмпирико-статистические исследования включали ряд направлений
Analyzed is the use of a social “portrayal” method in the study of the political elite in order to identify the peculiarities of Russian electorate’s behavior at municipal and national political elections at the turn of the 20th century
Summary
Что использование социального «портретирования» элиты в отечественных эмпирических исследованиях имеет длительную историю и использовалось еще в дореволюционный период. Что социальные характеристики элиты содержат важную информацию об электоральном выборе населения, указывая на то, кто и как, по мнению избирателей, должен представлять их интересы во властных структурах. При распределении этих лиц по избирательным разрядам, указывает Шрейдер, выясняется, что «верхи» предпочитают сохранять «проверенный» состав депутатов, а «низы» выступают за ротацию кадров [14, с.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.