Abstract
The article is devoted to a critical analysis of the amendment, which excluded the right to file a private complaint against a court ruling to leave the statement of claim without progress in civil proceedings. The inconsistency of possible arguments in favor of this amendment is revealed. The substitute procedure for challenging this definition by appealing against the decision on the return of the statement of claim is analyzed, and its inadequacy to the problem being solved is revealed. Based on this, the author comes to the conclusion that it is necessary to return to the previous appellate procedure for appealing directly to the ruling on leaving the statement of claim without movement.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
