Abstract
Aim: to compare the uniformity and adequacy of the placement of laser spots after mono-impulse and pattern photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema (DME). Patients and Methods: fundus photographs of 83 patients (121 eyes) taken right after retinal photocoagulation for DME were analyzed. Group 1 included images of 63 eyes after pattern photocoagulation and group 2 included images of 58 eyes after mono-impulse photocoagulation. Laser burns of varying intensity based on LʹEsperance scale (including grade 0 burns that were not seen on fundus photos) were calculated. Grade 2 burns were considered optimal. The number of non-optimal laser burns placed on retinal hemorrhages, blood vessels, hard exudates or healthy retina was calculated. The uniformity of the position of laser spots was assessed by calculating the standard deviation from the average distance between laser spots. Results: the percentage of laser spots of optimal intensity was 31.85% in group 1 and 25.15% in group 2. The percentage of non-optimally placed laser spots was 24.34% in group 1 and 7.99% in group 2. The uniformity of the placement was good in both groups (8.16 pixels and 8.44 pixels, respectively), no significant difference was reported (p=0.0591). Conclusion: pattern photocoagulation is preferable for DME compared to mono-impulse photocoagulation to provide adequate intensity of laser burns. Meanwhile, mono-impulse regimen provides more precise placement of laser spots. However, both conventional techniques are not effective enough due many intrinsic drawback, i.e., many laser spots are non-optimal in terms of intensity or placement. In routine practice, these drawbacks are outweighed by the skills and experience of laser surgeon. Planned precise placement of laser spots and the introduction of techniques of more precise preventive adjustment of energy level for each laser spot will contribute to the maximum effect of photocoagulation for DME. Further studies on personalized precise laser photocoagulation will improve the quality and efficacy of the treatment of macular edema. Keywords: diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema, mono-impulse photocoagulation, pattern photocoagulation, navigated photocoagulation. For citation: Zamytskiy E.A., Zolotarev A.V., Karlova E.V. et al. Comparative quantitative assessment of the placement and intensity of laser spots for treating diabetic macular edema. Russian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology. 2021;21(2):58–62. DOI: 10.32364/2311-7729- 2021-21-2-58-62.
Highlights
Results: the percentage of laser spots of optimal intensity was 31.85% in group 1 and 25.15% in group 2
Conclusion: pattern photocoagulation is preferable for diabetic macular edema (DME) compared to mono-impulse photocoagulation to provide adequate intensity of laser burns
Mono-impulse regimen provides more precise placement of laser spots. Both conventional techniques are not effective enough due many intrinsic drawback, i.e., many laser spots are non-optimal in terms of intensity or placement
Summary
Цель исследования: провести сравнительную количественную оценку интенсивности и адекватности расположения коагулятов при моноимпульсной и паттерн-лазеркоагуляции диабетического макулярного отека (ДМО). Материал и методы: материалом для исследования стали снимки глазного дна 83 пациентов (121 глаз), полученных сразу после лазеркоагуляции сетчатки по поводу ДМО. Результаты исследования: коагулятов оптимальной интенсивности было обнаружено 31,85% в I группе и 25,15% во II группе. Заключение: таким образом, при лечении ДМО паттерн-коагуляция более предпочтительна по сравнению с моноимпульсной в обеспечении достаточной интенсивности коагулятов. Моноимпульсный режим при этом обеспечивает более точное размещение коагулятов. Запланированное точное размещение коагулятов на сетчатке и внедрение способов более четкой превентивной коррекции энергии для каждого коагулята могут существенно упростить получение максимально возможного эффекта от лазеркоагуляции при лечении ДМО. Сравнительная количественная оценка расположения и интенсивности коагулятов при лазерном лечении диабетического макулярного отека.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
