Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of the phenomenon of meri tocracy, which arouses considerable interest today both in political journalism and academia. The article shows that meritocracy has largely become the ideo logy of modern neoliberal elites, and therefore often serves as a cover for the actual plutocracy. Although the framework of cognitive capitalism witnesses a certain movement towards meritocratic principles of the formation of elites, it simultaneously prepares ground for the emergence of a kind of “trap of meritocracy”, when, for a number of reasons, the layer of “educated and talented” turns into a hereditary caste. At the same time, according to the author, the future hardly belongs to meritocrats, no matter how well they fit into the realities of the high-tech economy. New developments in artificial intelligence are jeopardizing many forms of intellectual work, leading to a cut-throat competition for a decreasing number of high-paying jobs. In turn, the bourgeois world of labor is being replaced by a post-capitalist world of idleness and creativity as the production of intangible goods. The rapid development of social media makes emotional and social intelligence, as well as the ability to achieve popularity and influence through media activities, increasingly important. In other words, modern technology makes life difficult for cognitive elites, while opening up enormous opportunities for very different social groups. In this regard, the author puts forward a hypothesis according to which popularity will become a key criterion for the formation of elites in the foreseeable future rather than merit. Postcapitalist personocracy will gradually replace bourgeois meritocracy, which, however, does not exclude the possibility of the preservation of the myth of meritocracy, implying that those who can skillfully attract attention will be assigned various merits.
Highlights
The article is devoted to the study of the phenomenon of meritocracy, which arouses considerable interest today both in political journalism and academia
The article shows that meritocracy has largely become the ideology of modern neoliberal elites, and often serves as a cover for the actual plutocracy
The framework of cognitive capitalism witnesses a certain movement towards meritocratic principles of the formation of elites, it simultaneously prepares ground for the emergence of a kind of “trap of meritocracy”, when, for a number of reasons, the layer of “educated and talented” turns into a hereditary caste
Summary
Меритократии превратился в алиби для плутократии и ключевой идеологический элемент воспроизводства неолиберальной культуры. Меритократия предполагает ступенчатую систему социальной мобильности, продвигая этику конкурентного личного интереса, которая узаконивает неравенство и наносит ущерб сообществу, заставляя людей постоянно конкурировать между собой. В работе Литтлера детально прослеживается, как неолиберальные элиты брали на вооружение миф о меритократии. Но в условиях неолиберализма сама меритократия оказывается крайне избирательной, ибо включает в себя лишь наиболее богатых. Лицемерно рекламировали тяжелый труд как наиважнейший фактор социальной мобильности», Литтлер констатирует, что «подобный дискурс помогает стереть налет чрезмерной привилегированной праздности с личности говорящего, одновременно приписывая слушателю способность достичь аналогичного социального статуса — ту степень социальной мобильности, которая на практике достижима лишь для крошечного меньшинства»7. Одна из давно уже зафиксированных уязвимостей всякой меритократии заключается в том, что она может стать наследственной, поскольку честно заслужившие свой статус тем самым обретают и больше возможностей вкладываться в развитие своих потомков. 373283-neravnyevozmozhnosti-zvezdygollivuda-i-topmenedzhery-davalivzyatki). 9 Carnevale, Schmidt, and Strohl 2020
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The Journal of Political Theory, Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics Politeia
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.