СУДОВЕ ТА ПОЗАСУДОВЕ РОЗВ'ЯЗАННЯ СПОРІВ, ЩО ВИНИКАЮТЬ ІЗ ВІДНОСИН ЗАПОДІЯННЯ ШКОДИ МЕДИЧНИМ ПРАЦІВНИКОМ

Abstract

The article analyzes various forms of protection of the rights of individuals to compensation for harm caused by a medical specialist, which are used in different countries around the world. In particular, special attention is paid to those approaches to pre-trial and out-of-court dispute resolution arising from patient harm relationships used in the United States. Among the most common ways of resolving such disputes are seeking help from a separate body or unit of a medical institution (risk management), mediation and negotiations in medical disputes, pre-trial inspections ("screening panels"), which allow to find a more compromise way to protect individual rights, affected by the actions of medical specialist. Accordingly, the first part of the article carries out a terminological analysis of the category "relationship of harm to a health worker" and the search for the closest term ("medical malpractice"), which allows for research in English-language scientific sources. The second part of the article is devoted to the analysis and generalization of the methods used in the practice of other countries to compensate for damage caused by a medical specialist (medical malpractice). The last part of the article analyzes the Ukrainian legislation and practice of national courts, which showed that in cases of compensation for damage caused by a medical specialist, there are no common approaches and single law approaches. In particular, attention is paid to the procedure for assessing the quality of medical services provided in 2016 by clinical expert commissions of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine. The study provided an opportunity to justify in the conclusions the need and feasibility of introducing additional out-of-court methods of resolving disputes arising from the relationship of harm to medical workers.