Abstract

The article attempts to consider the “digital revolution” in the context of O. Cochin’s research and using his method. O. Cochin identifies two approaches to the study of the phenomenon of revolutions – an object-free one based on the thesis of “circumstances” and a subject one introducing the thesis of “small people”. Each of the approaches is a source-based filter, creates its own paradigm-theoretical field, thereby predetermining the results of the study. The choice of one or another field is determined by the will of the researcher. An attempt is made to identify two similar approaches, and, as a result, the emergence of two opposite paradigms for the study of the digital revolution with its strategy of “zeroing out” civilization. It is shown that being in the paradig-matic field of the “thesis of circumstances” makes us ignore the subjective factor of history and hides the true subject of the revolution. The paradigmatic space of the thesis of “small people”, “inversely oriented” in relation to the big people, is based on the identification of the subjective factor of history and leads researchers to the inevitability of entering the theory of anti-systems of L.N. Gumilev.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.