Abstract
The paper considers an approach that allows reducing the subjectivity of experts’ opinions when evaluating dissertations, as well as assessing the likelihood of their completion being successful. The approach is based on using expert evaluation expressed as linguistic variables on graduate students (adjuncts)’ elaboration depth of individual sections of their dissertations. Following this, an analytical model is formed, which is grounded on the theory of experiment planning.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
