Abstract
The optimal conditions for the microextraction separation, preconcentration and spectrophotometric determination of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) as an its ion associate (IA) with Quinaldine Red (QR) have been studied. Was tested a large number of organic solvents as extractants. Aliphatic hydrocarbons (hexane) extracted IA considerably weaker than, halogen and nitro derivatives of hydrocarbons (chlorobenzene, bromobenzene, nitrobenzene, chloroform, dichloroethane), extracted with IA and the simple salt of the dye. The best solvent found for the extraction of SDS was mixture of carbon tetrachloride with dichloroethane or chloroform that provided 10 to 50 fold concentration of SDS by microvolume of organic phase. The maximum extraction of SDS was achieved in the concentration range of QR 1.0∙10 –4 mol/l of QR after which the optical density does not change practically (excess dye remains in the aqueous phase). The dye of QR is highly stable in an alkaline environment, it can be used for the extraction of SDS in a wide pH range and rely on high selectivity determination. The pH range for maximum extraction of ion associate was 4–12. We found that 50000–100000-fold amounts F – , Cl – , Br – , NO 2 – , HCO 3 – , CH 3 COO – , SO 4 2– , 10000–20000-fold amounts NO 3 – , I – , HPO 4 2– , B 4 O 7 2– , IO 3 – , ClO 3 – , C 2 O 4 2– , 300-fold amounts ClO 4 – do not interfere with the determination of SDS. The molar ratio of SDS and QR determined by various spectrophotometric methods (isomolar series, Asmus, equilibrium shift) is 1:1. The limit of detection was 0.04 µg/ml. A new method of extraction-spectrophotometric determination was applied to the determination of anionic surfactants in various wastewater samples.
Highlights
МІКРОЕКСТРАКЦІЙНЕ РОЗДІЛЕННЯ, КОНЦЕНТРУВАННЯ І СПЕКТРОФОТОМЕТРИЧНЕ ВИЗНАЧЕННЯ ДОДЕЦИЛСУЛЬФАТУ НАТРІЮ У ВИГЛЯДІ ІОННОГО АСОЦІАТУ З ХІНАЛЬДИНОВИМ ЧЕРВОНИМ Василина М
We found that 50000–100000-fold amounts F, Cl, Br, NO2, HCO3, CH3COO, SO42, 10000–20000-fold amounts NO3, I, HPO42, B4O72, IO3, ClO3, C2O42, 300-fold amounts ClO4– do not interfere with the determination of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)
Photometric determination of anionic surfactants with flow-injection analyzer that includes a chromatomembrane cell for sample preconcentration by liquid-liquid solvent extraction / L.N. Moskvin, J
Summary
Исходный 1·10– 2 М раствор ДДС готовили растворением точной навески препарата (SIGMA) в воде. Рабочие растворы ДДС с концентрацией 498 нм на спектрофотометре WPA Lightwave II+. 1·10–3 – 1·10–5 моль/л готовили последова- (Biochrom, USA) в микрокюветах специальной тельным разбавлением исходного раствора конструкции (l = 0.5 см, V = 5 мкл). Параллельдистиллированной водой в день эксперимен- но проводили контрольный опыт (без ДДС). Электронные спектры поглоли добавлением аммиачно-ацетатных буфер- щения регистрировали на спектрофотометре ных растворов, HCl, H2SO4, NaOH. Водный 1·10–3 Specord S600 (Analytic Jena, Germany). ЗначеМ раствор красителя ХК готовили растворени- ния рН растворов измеряли потенциометром ем в бидистилляте точной навески препарата ORION 720A (Thermo Scienti-fic, USA) со сте-
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Вісник Дніпропетровського університету. Серія Хімія
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.