Abstract

The purpose of the article is to assess the effectiveness of introducing new state duty rates in the event of a judicial appeal of an administrative act, which, in our opinion, leads to disproportionate interference in the constitutional right to judicial protection. In this article, we highlighted techniques and measures (method) aimed at identifying and highlighting the problems that currently exist after the abolition of existing state tax benefits. The focus of the article lies in examining the justification for multiple increases in state duty rates and the removal of existing incentives for state duty payment. These changes have resulted in an imbalanced impact on the constitutional right to access judicial protection. The article conducts a comparative analysis within the framework of upholding the constitutional human right to judicial protection and the constitutional principle of proportionality.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.