Ефективність впровадження програми корекційно-профілактичних заходів для офісних працівників з різним станом біомеханіки опорно-рухового апарату

Abstract

Topicality. Today's challenges require further improvement of technologies for correcting the motor activity of office workers through the use of a wide range of health fitness tools, which are gaining more and more popularity at the current stage. Goal. To determine the effectiveness of implementing a program of corrective and preventive measures for men aged 36–45 who work in offices at a computer. Research Methods: comparative analysis of the angular characteristics of the biogeometric profile of men's posture and indicators of their physical fitness before and after the study. The Results of the conducted research proved the effectiveness of corrective and preventive classes in terms of the positive impact on indicators of body goniometry and physical fitness of men in the second period of maturity with a round back. Thus, in men aged 36–45, the head tilt angle (a1) increased statistically significantly (T=0; Z=3,516; p=0,0004) by 10,5 %, a statistically significant (T=0; Z=3,516; p=0,0004) increase in the visual angle (a2) by 1,60 % was also recorded, and the angle of inclination of the trunk (a3) decreased statistically significantly (T=1,5; Z=3,439; p=0,0006) by 20,0 %. Recorded: statistically significant (T=0; Z=3,516; p=0,0004) increase in upper limb strength by 40 %, statistically significant (T=0; Z=3,296; p=0,00104) increase in speed-power index abilities by 66,67 %, a statistically significant (T=0; Z=3,516; p=0,0004) increase in the flexibility index by 62,5 %, and the shoulder girdle strength index is statistically significant (T=0; Z=3,516; p =0,0004) increased by only 7,55 %. Conclusion. According to the results of the comparative analysis, it was found that in both subgroups of men, angle α1 and angle α2 increased statistically significantly (p<0,05), and angle α3 decreased statistically significantly (p<0,05), while in men 36–40 years, the angle α1 and angle α2 increased more rapidly. The comparative analysis of physical fitness indicators before and after the study made it possible to state a statistically significant (p<0,05) improvement in both men 36–40 and men 41–45 years old. Thus, the conducted research confirmed the effectiveness of our proposed program.