Abstract
The article examines the problem of legal constructions’ interpretation in the context theory of Ȝ-calculus as logical foundation of modern programming languages. The purpose of the study is to show the methodological obstacles to the “machinezation” of law, caused by the specifics of jurisprudence’ conceptoterminological apparatus. The methodological basis of the research is represented by the philosophical concepts of knowledge, function and concept, the dialectical method, metascientific means of cognition (system approach, logical method of Ȝ-calculus), special methods of legal science (legal dogmatic and legal exegesis). The study concludes that the dogmatic principles of jurisprudence, the concepto-terminological apparatus of which largely determines the content of positive legal norms, impede the algorithmicization of legal constructions and, in current conditions, make it impossible to form the so-called "machine-readable" law
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
