Abstract

National interests requiring improvements of a uni-fied crime prevention system in the Russian Federa-tion make executors of law and researchers focus on the place and role of the court in crime prevention. While acknowledging the multi-functionality of courts, the authors highlight their preventive func-tion in relation to a violation of legitimacy and pro-cedural irregularities resulting in private resolutions and rulings. The studies on the legal framework of the power of courts to provide private resolutions and rulings make it possible to reveal the binding response of the court to violations of citizens’ rights and legitimate interests and other offenses identi-fied in the trial. Noting the lack of court involvement in this activity, the authors attempt to determine its causes and propose making amendments to Article 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. In particular, when imposing a sentence, the court should reveal the circumstances (or the lack of them) contributing to the commission of an offense, a violation of citizens’ rights and freedoms and other breaches of the law committed by a lower-level court during inquiries, pre-trial investigation, or criminal proceedings.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.