Abstract

This research is aimed at exploring interpretation differences in Surah al-Baqarah between Abu Muslim al-Asfahani (d. 322AH/933CE) and Fakhr al-Din al-Razi’s (d. 606/1210) al-Tafsir al-Kabir. Through critical study to uncover the character of these differences, comparing their interpretations with other exegetes as well as correlating their thought with the Quranic exegesis and its sciences, this study demonstrates that a possible tarjih (choosing between existing opinions) can be inferred on this matter. This approach facilitates to address the character of these differences at establishing their arguments that were supported with valid evidences. Hence, the study employs inductive analytical evidence-based approach that traces the controversial issues between Abu Muslim al-Asfahani and al-Razi in the first juz’ (part) of Surat al-Baqarah until verse 115 in al-Tafsir al-Kabir. To summarize the article, al-Razi's opposition to the opinions of Abu Muslim essentially followed the principles of Quranic exegesis and its sciences in addition to the advocacy of majority of Muslim scholars.

Highlights

  • ‫‪differences at establishing their arguments that were supported with valid evidences

  • Al-Razi's opposition to the opinions of‬‬ ‫‪Abu Muslim essentially followed the principles of Quranic exegesis and its sciences in addition‬‬ ‫‪to the advocacy of majority of Muslim scholars.‬‬

  • ‫‪ 65‬السيوطي‪( ،‬د‪.‬ت‪.‬ن‪ ،).‬د‪,‬ط‪ ،.‬لباب النقول في أسباب النزول‪ ،‬ص‪ ،16:‬قال الحاكم‪ :‬حديث صحيح على شرط الشيخان ولم يخرجاه‪.‬‬ ‫‪ 66‬والظاهر‪:‬خلاف الباطن‪ .‬وظَهر ال َّشيءُ‪ :‬تبين‪ .‬وبدا واَتّضح بعد خفاء‪ .‬وأظهر ال َّشيءَ‪ :‬بَيّنه وكشفه وأوضحه‪ ،‬ابن فارس‪1979( ،‬م)‪ ،‬د‪.‬ط‪ ،.‬مقاييس‬ ‫اللغة‪ ،‬تحقيق عبد السلام محمد هارون ج‪ 3.‬ص ‪471‬؛ وعبد الحميد عمر‪ ،‬وأحمد مختار بمساعدة فريق عمل‪ ،)2003( ،‬ط‪ ،1‬معجم اللغة العربية المعاصرة‪،‬‬ ‫عالم الكتب‪ ،‬ج‪ 2.‬ص ‪ .1441‬وقال الزركشي‪ ":‬الظاهر هو دليل شرعي يجب اتباعه والعمل به‪ ،‬بدليل إجماع الصحابة على العمل بظواهر الألفاظ"‪.‬‬ ‫الزركشي‪ ،)1993( ،‬ط‪ ،1‬البحر امحقيط في أصول الفقه‪ ،‬دار الكتبي‪ ،‬ج‪ 5.‬ص‪ .36-35‬وأما التأويل‪ ،‬فقد ح َّده الزركشي فقال‪ " :‬هو صرف اللفظ عن‬ ‫ظاهره‪ ،‬وشرطه أن يكون موافقا لوضع اللغة أو عرف الاستعمال أو عادة صاحب الشرع‪ .‬وكل تأويل خرج عن هذه الثلاثة فباطل"‪ ،‬الزركشي‪ ،‬المصدر‬

Read more

Summary

Introduction

‫‪differences at establishing their arguments that were supported with valid evidences.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call