Abstract

One of the main goals of intellectual property rights is to ensure financial protection of intellectual property rights of the rightsholder in case of violation. The article analyses the international experience of damages valuation criteria application for measuring losses through illegal exploitation of intellectual property (patents, trademarks, copyrights, etc.). The ability to make preliminary damage measuring due to the illegal use of intellectual property helps make better litigation choices. It is crucial to understand the basic approaches and damages valuation criteria in determining material loss. On the one hand, it helps the rightsholder make an informed and optimal decision to recover a reasonable amount of compensation in court. On the other hand, understanding the approach to determining damages affects the type and number of witnesses, facts, and experts involved in defending the case. Authors consider approaches and damage criteria for assessing the loss caused to rightsholders on the example of the European Union, the United States, and Colombia. It is shown that the same criteria are used in different countries for damages: lost benefit of the rightsholder; the profit of the offender; lump sum damage and/or hypothetical (“reasonable”) royalties; compensation established by law; coverage of other indirect losses. However, applying these criteria in different countries is different for the reimbursement of different types of intellectual property rights. The international experience analysis of damages valuation criteria application for measuring losses through intellectual property illegal exploitation allows to improve the normative-legal field in Ukraine and create a national methodology of damages measuring caused by illegal exploitation of the intellectual property.

Highlights

  • Ключові слова: об’єкт права інтелектуальної власності, захист і охорона об’єктів права інтелектуальної власності, втрачена вигода, неправомірний прибуток, одноразове відшкодування або гіпотетичне (“розумне”) роялті, критерій оцінки матеріальної шкоди

  • The article analyses the international experience of damages valuation criteria application for measuring losses through illegal exploitation of intellectual property

  • It is shown that the same criteria are used in different countries for damages: lost benefit of the rightsholder; the profit of the offender; lump sum damage and/or hypothetical (“reasonable”) royalties; compensation established by law; coverage of other indirect losses

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ключові слова: об’єкт права інтелектуальної власності, захист і охорона об’єктів права інтелектуальної власності, втрачена вигода, неправомірний прибуток, одноразове відшкодування або гіпотетичне (“розумне”) роялті, критерій оцінки матеріальної шкоди. THE INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF DAMAGES VALUATION CRITERIA APPLICATION FOR MEASURING LOSSES THROUGH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ILLEGAL EXPLOITATION The article analyses the international experience of damages valuation criteria application for measuring losses through illegal exploitation of intellectual property (patents, trademarks, copyrights, etc.).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.