ПРОЦЕССУАЛЬНЫЕ ФОРМЫ ХОДАТАЙСТВ О ПРИЗНАНИИ ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВ НЕДОПУСТИМЫМИ. ФОРМЫ И ВИДЫ СУДЕБНЫХ АКТОВ, ВЫНОСИМЫХ ПО РЕЗУЛЬТАТАМ РАССМОТРЕНИЯ ТАКИХ ХОДАТАЙСТВ

Abstract

The article examines problematic practical issues of criminal proceedings regarding the procedural forms of the parties' applications for recognition of evidence obtained in violation of the requirements of the law; procedural forms and types of decisions made by the court when resolving petitions for challenging evidence, as well as the need for the court to resolve such petitions with mandatory removal to the advisory room. The conducted research has shown that at the legislative level there are no requirements for the procedural form of petitions for recognition of evidence obtained in violation of the current legislation, for the procedural form and types of judicial acts issued based on the results of consideration of such petitions, as well as for the requirements for the need for the court to resolve the petition filed by the parties for recognition of evidence obtained in violation of the current legislation with mandatory removal to the conference room. The result of the study was the author's position on the development of ways to improve the criminal procedure legislation, which reflected all the above-mentioned gaps in the criminal procedure legislation.