Abstract

The article discusses a decision of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation devoted to the consequences of change in law that eliminates prohibition on dissemination of certain information. It is argued that such changes should lead to discontinuation of enforcement of a court decision prohibiting the information; the changes in law, however, do not constitute ground for a trial de novo since the court did not err when rendering such decision, and only judicial errors can be proper grounds for annulment of a decision that has become res judicata.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call