Исторические предпосылки разработки иных мер уголовно-правового характера, направленных на ограничение прав лиц, совершивших преступления против интересов Российской Федерации

Abstract

The relevance of the topic is due to the need for a retrospective analysis of individual measures of state enforcement in order to understand their criminal legal nature. The history of the development of other measures of a criminal law nature in relation to individual groups of crimes is practically not considered in the criminal law literature. Encroachments on the interests of the state the punishment for which has traditionally been one of the most severe among socially dangerous acts prohibited by criminal law are no excluded. Nevertheless, the analysis of historical sources shows that the limits of coercion in this area have changed over time significantly. The changes that took place were related to the policy of the state, namely the humanization of punishment - the mitigation of the means of influence used against persons guilty of committing crimes against the interests of the state. Today, this trend generally continues. Along with the rigidity of the approach, the authorities allow a compromise, reasonably believing that a different impact or border measures can ensure the effectiveness of prevention.
 Traditional methods were used in the study organizing - generalization, analysis, analogy.
 Results. The development of the criminal law science, as well as the humanism ideas dominance, the human resources economy, led to the implementation of a fundamentally different approach in the entire field of criminal law regulation. We believe that the further development of this area will allow us to determine new prospects for countering the crimes of the group under study.