Abstract
The subject of comparative legal analysis in this work is the ambiguous norms of the criminal procedure law of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Tajikistan regarding the procedural status and real powers of the prosecutor to carry out the function of criminal prosecution at the stage of initiation of a criminal case. Analyzing the norms of the law, the positions of the national doctrine and directly the patterns of activity carried out at this stage, the author discusses the main problems, conflicts of practice, gaps in the law, suggesting measures to remove contradictions and optimize practice.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Legal Science and Practice: Journal of Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
