ВОПРОСЫ МЕЖОТРАСЛЕВОЙ ПРЕЮДИЦИИ СУДЕБНЫХ АКТОВ, ПОСТАНОВЛЕННЫХ ПО УГОЛОВНЫМ ДЕЛАМ И ПО ДЕЛАМ ОБ АДМИНИСТРАТИВНЫХ ПРАВОНАРУШЕНИЯХ, В ГРАЖДАНСКОМ ПРОЦЕССЕ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ

Abstract

In this article, the authors analyze the provisions of the Institute of prejudice in civil proceedings, concerning the issues of prejudice of judicial acts decided in criminal proceedings, and also highlight some of the problems arising in their application in judicial practice and possible solutions to such problems. The institution of prejudice in civil proceedings has undergone significant changes, including in terms of the list of law enforcement acts, which the legislator has given a pre-judicial value. At the same time, both in the scientific world and in law enforcement practice, the question remains open as to how to correctly assess the information contained in the decision to terminate a criminal case on non-rehabilitating grounds, if such a decision was made not at the judicial stage of criminal proceedings. This problem, in the opinion of authors is becoming increasingly important in light of the reform of the procedural legislation to ensure reasonable terms of consideration of civil disputes, as well as assist people are victims of crime with maximum support from the state in obtaining evidence of harm as a result of this wrongful act.