Abstract

In nineteenth-century Romantic poetry, the lyric “I” was usually identified with the poet himself. This changed at the beginning of the twentieth century, when poets (Pound and Eliot, for instance) introduced speakers (“personae”) into their poetry who were clearly different from themselves. Instead of “the poet”, new terms were introduced to refer to the speaker in the poem. In German lyric theory, the term “das lyrische Ich” (“the lyric I”) became popular, as in Russian did “liricheskii geroi” (“the lyric hero”). English and American critics generally use “the speaker” and “the poet” (often indiscriminately in the same book or article). As the speaker in the poem is, in principle, a fictive construct and cannot be identified with the poet, and as many poems do not have an “I”, this paper argues for the use of the term “the speaker”.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.