Искусственный интеллект против ученого в вопросе о сохранении баланса между правом на информацию и необходимостью защиты персональных данных от незаконного использования

Abstract

This article reflects the results of a scientific experiment caused by a discussion about the possibility of replacing scientists with neural networks. The development of digital technologies today raises many controversial issues in science and legal practice. One of the most popular is the question of how to ensure human protection in the context of the transformation of inviolable rights and freedoms: information, privacy and inviolability. The large-scale spread of new technologies poses many questions to the regulator, one of which is the question of finding a balance between the right to information and the need to ensure the protection of personal data in a dynamic and constantly evolving Internet environment. Such a choice is faced by the legislator due to the fact that the spread of innovations involves constant work with personal data, accelerating their exchange, storage and protection. The introduction of digital technologies is beneficial for the development of public services, interaction and control, which ultimately leads to increased efficiency and accelerated information exchange for citizens and legal entities. Taking into account the progressive development of artificial intelligence technologies, it was quite interesting to conduct an experiment comparing the answers to the question of maintaining a balance between the right to information and the need to protect personal data given by scientists and artificial intelligence, in particular, the YandexGPT2 neural network. The responses of the neural network are analyzed for compliance with the main criteria of scientific work: reliability, objectivity and novelty, and are evaluated in comparison with the response of the authors of the scientific article.