Abstract

The genesis of the National Preventive Mechanism is examined in the article. The fact that the chosen model of “Ombudsman +” involves a combination of the Ombudsman’s Institute, along with representatives of non-governmental organizations and members of the public is found out. The implementation of the Ombudsman + model envisages that not only the Ombudsman himself will be involved in the process of monitoring the human rights observance in places of detention, but also members of the public who will be able to visit places of detention after receiving certain rights from the Ombudsman and check human rights there and then report to the central office, in order to fix the problems or provide recommendations to local (or central) executive bodies for improving the situation. Emphasis is placed on the fact that the establishment of the National Preventive Mechanism should in no way duplicate the functions of bodies such as the Prosecutor’s Office or the National Police. Proposed changes will help to improve the proper implementation of the National Preventive Mechanism: improvements of the legislation governing the activities of places of detention; changes in the standards of providing certain social services (applies to social places of detention); creation of bodies to monitor compliance with standards in places of detention; creation of new monitoring mechanisms to monitor compliance with standards during the stay of people in places of detention; changes in the attitude of society towards people who find themselves in places of detention and promoting the policy of “openness” of such institutions, etc. Key words: Commissioner for Human Rights of the Verkhovna Rada, National Preventive Mechanism; rights and legitimate interests; convicts; prisoners; “Ombudsman +”.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call