Robotic-assisted Sacrocolpopexy Research Articles

Mid-term outcomes of laparoscopic vaginal stump?round (Kakinuma method) and stump?uterosacral (Shull method) ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective comparative study

BackgroundLaparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RSC) using mesh are popular approaches for treating pelvic organ prolapse (POP). However, it is not uncommon that native tissue repair (NTR) should be presented as an option to patients who are expected to have extensive intraperitoneal adhesion or patients for whom LSC or RSC is difficult owing to various risk factors. Laparoscopic vaginal stump–uterosacral ligament fixation (Shull method) has been introduced as a method for NTR in case of POP. However, effective repair using this surgical procedure may not be possible in severe POPs. To solve the problems of the Shull method, we devised the laparoscopic vaginal stump–round ligament fixation (Kakinuma method) in which the vaginal stump is fixed to the uterine round ligament, a histologically strong tissue positioned anatomically higher than the uterosacral ligament. This study aimed to retrospectively and clinically compare the two methods.MethodsOf the 78 patients who underwent surgery for POP between January 2017 and June 2022 and postoperative follow-up for at least a year, 40 patients who underwent the Shull method (Shull group) and 38 who underwent the Kakinuma method (Kakinuma group) were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsNo significant differences were observed between the two groups in patient background variables such as mean age, parity, body mass index, and POP-Q stage. The mean operative duration and mean blood loss in the Shull group were 140.5 ± 31.7 min and 91.3 ± 96.3 ml, respectively, whereas the respective values in the Kakinuma group were 112.2 ± 25.3 min and 31.4 ± 47.7 ml, respectively. Thus, compared with the Shull group, the operative duration was significantly shorter (P < 0.001) and blood loss was significantly less (P = 0.003) in the Kakinuma group. Recurrence was observed in six patients (15.0%) in the Shull group and two patients (5.3%) in the Kakinuma group. Hence, compared with the Shull group, recurrence was significantly less in the Kakinuma group (P = 0.015). No patients experienced perioperative complications in either group.ConclusionsThe results suggest that the Kakinuma method can serve as a novel and viable NTR procedure for POP.

Suture-Needle Management Device and Novel Port Configuration for Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.

Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (SCP) is a commonly performed procedure for the repair of apical pelvic organ prolapse; therefore, novel devices and techniques to improve safety and efficacy of this procedure should be explored. The objective of this study was to assess safety and efficacy of 8-mm trocar site for use of a disposable suture/needle management device (StitchKit; Origami Surgical, Madison, NJ) for robot-assisted SCP with a 4-arm configuration and no assistant port. This is a retrospective case series of patients undergoing robot-assisted SCP at a tertiary center from 2018 to 2021. All surgical procedures were performed using four 8-mm robotic trocars and StitchKit device. Our objective was to review all cases in which this technique was used to determine whether the approach resulted in a safely completed procedure and any complications or adverse events. Secondary objectives were to describe patient and operative characteristics. In total, 422 patients underwent robot-assisted SCP for pelvic organ prolapse. The mean age was 60 ± 10 years, and mean body mass index was 27 ± 6 (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared). Most patients had stage 3 prolapse (73%) and underwent concomitant hysterectomy (70%). Ninety-nine percent (n = 416) of cases were completed robotically. StitchKit was successfully inserted and removed in all robotic cases with correct needle counts. All patients had postoperative visits, and 80% followed up at 3 months. No umbilical/port site hernias, operative site infections, or adverse events were reported. Robot-assisted SCP can be performed safely using a 4-arm robotic configuration and suture kit device. This setup eliminates incisions greater than 8 mm and an assistant port, allowing for surgical efficiency without compromising patient outcomes.

Postoperative complications and unanticipated healthcare encounters following mini-laparotomy vs. laparoscopic/robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a comparative retrospective study

BackgroundPelvic organ prolapse is a debilitating condition impacting lives of millions of women worldwide. Sacrocolpopexy (SCP) is considered an effective and durable surgical technique for treatment of apical prolapse. The aim of this study was to compare short-term outcomes including postoperative complications and unanticipated healthcare encounters between patients who underwent SCP with a mini-laparotomy approach compared to patients treated with laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic SCP.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study including patients treated for apical prolapse at a university affiliated urogynecology practice. Patients over the age of 18 who underwent abdominal SCP between 2019 and 2023 were included. The cohort was formed into two groups: (1) Patients who underwent SCP through a mini-laparotomy incision (Mini-lap group); (2) Patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic-assisted laparoscopic SCP (Lap/Robot group).ResultsA total of 116 patients were included in the final analysis. Ninety patients underwent either laparoscopic or robotic-assisted SCP, whereas 26 patients underwent SCP with a mini-laparotomy approach. Study participants exhibited a mean age of 63.1 ± 10.3 years, mean body mass index (BMI) of 25.8 ± 4.9 Kg/m2, and 77.6% of them identified as Caucasian. Upon comparison of demographic and past medical history between groups there were no statistically significant differences in age, BMI, menopausal status, race, parity or comorbid conditions. Patients in the Mini-lap group were less likely to have undergone previous abdominal surgery (11.5% vs. 50.6%, p < 0.001) and had more severe apical prolapse (stage 4 prolapse, 40% vs. 21.2%, p < 0.001) than their counterparts in the Lap/robot group. Regarding intraoperative parameters, length of surgery was significantly shorter in the Mini-lap group compared to the Lap/robot group (97.3 ± 35.0 min vs. 242.0 ± 52.6 min, p < 0.001). When focusing on the primary outcome, postoperative complications within the first 30 days after surgery, there were no differences noted between groups. Additionally, the number of unanticipated healthcare encounters, such as phone calls, clinic visits, emergency department visits, urgent care visits, readmissions and reoperations were similar between groups.ConclusionsMini-laparotomy approach for SCP is safe with comparable intra- and postoperative complications, and unanticipated healthcare encounters compared to conventional minimally invasive methods.

Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: efficiency of robotic assistance compared to standard laparoscopy

Minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy (SC) is the treatment of choice for symptomatic, high-grade, apical or multi-compartmental pelvic organ prolapse (POP), in terms of anatomical correction and treatment durability. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC) could be an attractive alternative to the gold standard laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC), for its ergonomic advantages in such a technically demanding procedure. However, it has not yet proven its superiority, consequently raising cost-effectiveness issues. Our primary objective was to assess if RASC can achieve better overall operative time (OOT) over LSC, with at least equivalent perioperative results. This was a single-center retrospective study including 100 patients (58 consecutive RASC cases and 42 LSC within the same time-period), with primary endpoint the OOT in both groups. Secondary results included complication rate, hospital stay, short-term anatomic results and OOT within and beyond the RASC learning curve. A multivariate linear regression was carried out for our primary outcome. The groups had comparable characteristics, except for BMI, which was lower in RASC group. The mean OOT was significantly lower in the RASC group (188 vs. 217 min, p ≤ 0.01), even after adjusting for possible confounders. Short-term anatomic results, complication rate, and blood loss were similar in the two groups. Mean hospital stay was significantly longer in the RASC group. Average RASC OOT was significantly shorter after the first 20 cases realized. This study demonstrated a significant reduction of OOT for RASC compared to LSC, with similar perioperative results, encouraging further use of the robotic technology for this indication.

Identifying Patient and Surgical Criteria for Same-Day Discharge After Robotic-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy.

Introduction: To review the postrobotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC) course of women admitted for 23 hours post-RASC and identify events requiring intensive medical care or potentially leading to deleterious outcome or urgent readmission if that patient had same-day discharge (SDD) instead of observed overnight. Methods: Patients undergoing RASC from January to December 2020 at one institution were identified and relevant data were obtained via retrospective chart review. Patient exclusions: RASC start time after 12:00 PM, concurrent posterior colporrhaphy, rectopexy, or hysterectomy, or conversion to open. Results: Sixty-nine patients (median age 71 years old) met study criteria with majority American Society of Anesthesiologists class 2 (n = 46, 67%) or 3 (n = 22, 32%). Patient characteristics included prior abdominal surgeries (n = 58, 84%), prior hysterectomy/prolapse repair (n = 25, 37%), known allergy to pain medication (n = 25, 36%), and administration of a postoperative antiemetic (n = 37, 54%) or intra-/postoperative keterolac (n = 36, 52%). Median surgery length was 269 minutes. Postoperative events that may have resulted in urgent readmissions if they had SDD were observed in 6% of patients. In the 1st week post-RASC, there were no readmissions. Conclusions: In this limited quality assurance study, patients undergoing RASC experienced no major complications requiring intensive care. Postoperative events were almost entirely nausea and pain, with no readmissions within the 1st week.

10229 Surgical and Patient Reported Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Sacro-Colpopexy and Sacro-Cervicopexy Using Autologous Rectus Fascia

10229 Surgical and Patient Reported Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Sacro-Colpopexy and Sacro-Cervicopexy Using Autologous Rectus Fascia

A comparative analysis of the HUGOTM robot-assisted surgery system and the Da Vinci® Xi surgical system for robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse treatment.

We aimed to compare the outcomes of Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC) performed using the novel HUGOTM Robot-Assisted Surgery (RAS) System with the Da Vinci® Xi surgical system. Data from 38 women undergoing RASC for a ≥ 2-grade pelvic organ prolapse were collected (2021-2023). Overall, 23 (60.5%) and 15 (39.5%) procedures were performed using the DaVinci® Xi and the HUGOTM RAS system, respectively. The median total operative time was 123 (IQR:106.5-140.5) minutes for the DaVinci® Xi versus 120 (IQR:120-146) minutes for the HUGOTM RAS cases (p=0.5). No conversion to open/laparoscopic surgery, perioperative complications, or system failures occurred. No differences were recorded according to day of catheter removal and length ofstay. This study represents the first worldwide comparison of RASC executed using the HUGOTM RAS versus the Da Vinci® Xi System. Our data suggest that RASC might be performed with both robotic platforms with similar perioperative outcomes.

Pain With Differing Insufflation Pressures During Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

ABSTRACT Pain after surgery may have different origins, such as incisions, affected viscera, surgical positioning, or peritoneal irritation from insufflation. Shoulder pain after gynecological laparoscopic surgery is a common concern thought to be associated with peritoneal irritation. Decreasing this pain is therefore a target for improvement of analgesic requirements and overall postoperative pain. This study aimed to determine changes in postoperative pain, surgical safety, and analgesic use via decreased insufflation pressures. The study was designed as a single-blinded, randomized clinical trial at a singular medical center within the United States where surgical treatment took place for pelvic organ prolapse via robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Included were women 18 years or older who were able to complete the visual analog scale without assistance and who underwent scheduled robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. After inclusion, participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy with peritoneal insufflation pressure at either 12 mm Hg (experimental) or 15 mm Hg (standard). Surgeries were performed by a single board-certified urogynecologist and resident assistant using a standard technique, the DaVinci Xi system, and an 8-mm AirSeal assist port. Surgeons and assisting OR professionals were not blinded to insufflation pressure. On the first postoperative day, all participants were asked to rate pain via a visual analog scale, as well as at 2 weeks postoperatively (with the addition of a PGI-I questionnaire). The 2-week surveys were collected by the principal investigator or primary surgeon (unblinded). A Likert scale of 0 to 10 was used to rate the highest preoperative and postoperative pain in the postanesthesia care unit. At the time of surgery, preoperative analgesia and opioid use were verified with active prescription records. After surgery, data were recorded for operative time, analgesic doses, conversion to laparotomy or increased insufflation pressure, additionally performed procedures, estimated blood loss, and length of stay. Enrollment occurred from April 27, 2021, to May 17, 2022, with final follow-up being completed on June 1, 2022. A total of 80 participants were enrolled, with 41 in the experimental insufflation group, and 39 in the standard insufflation group. Baseline differences did not exist between groups for prior abdominal surgeries, medical comorbidities, leading edge of prolapse, age, or body mass index. Although median preoperative pain was recorded as zero for both groups, the standard insufflation group did report a statistically higher pain level in the postoperative period. Furthermore, women in the experimental/lower insufflation group used statistically fewer morphine milliequivalents immediately after surgery as well as after discharge. There were no apparent operative problems significantly associated with lower insufflation pressures, as operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of stay in the hospital were not significantly different between groups. The analysis found that the use of 12 mm Hg insufflation pressure did lower opioid use and pain levels in comparison with 15 mm Hg in the immediate postoperative period. The use of this method proved both feasible and safe in all cases, without blood loss, operating time changes, or changes in completing cases through minimal invasive mess. These encouraging findings provide a zero-cost, surgeon-driven intervention method for the postoperative period of robotic gynecological surgeries with the potential lower patient pain levels and opioid use.

PE007 - A comparative analysis of the HUGO™ robot-assisted surgery system and the Da Vinci® Xi surgical system for robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy

PE007 - A comparative analysis of the HUGO™ robot-assisted surgery system and the Da Vinci® Xi surgical system for robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy

Robot-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy versus Trans-Vaginal Multicompartment Prolapse Repair: Impact on Lower Bowel Tract Function.

This study evaluated the effectiveness, safety, and possible changes in bowel symptoms after multicompartment prolapse surgery by comparing two different surgical approaches, transvaginal mesh surgery with levatorplasty (TVMLP) and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RSC). All patients underwent pelvic (POP-Q staging system) and rectal examination to evaluate anal sphincter tone in the lithotomy position with the appropriate Valsalva test. The preoperative evaluation included urodynamics and pelvic magnetic resonance defecography. Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at follow-up measured subjective improvement. All patients completed Agachan-Wexner's questionnaire at 0 and 12 months of follow-up to evaluate bowel symptoms. A total of 73 cases were randomized into the RSC group (36 cases) and TVMLP group (37 cases). After surgery, the main POP-Q stage in both groups was stage I (RCS 80.5% vs. TVMLP 82%). There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in postoperative anal sphincter tone: 35%. The TVMLP group experienced a hypertonic anal sphincter, while none of the RSC group did. Regarding subjective improvement, the median PGI-I was 1 in both groups. At 12 months of follow-up, both groups exhibited a significant improvement in bowel symptoms. RSC and TVMLP successfully corrected multicompartment POP. RSC showed a greater improvement in the total Agachan-Wexner score and lower bowel symptoms.

Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy.

This review aimed to summarize the complications and surgical outcomes of robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Nineteen original articles on 1,440 robotic sacrocolpopexies were reviewed, and three systematic reviews and meta-analyses were summarized in terms of intraoperative, perioperative, postoperative, and/or surgical outcomes. Robotic sacrocolpopexy has demonstrated low overall complication rates and favorable surgical outcomes. Nevertheless, long-term follow-up outcomes regarding objective and/or subjective prolapse recurrence, reoperation rates, and mesh-related complications remain unclear. Further research is required to demonstrate whether the robotic approach for sacrocolpopexy is feasible or can become the modality of choice in the future when performing sacrocolpopexy.

Robot-assisted sacrohysteropexy vs robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy in women with primary advanced apical prolapse: A retrospective cohort study.

This study aimed to evaluate the anatomic and clinical outcomes of robot-assisted sacrohysteropexy (RASH) against robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC) for the treatment of primary advanced apical prolapse. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all robot-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgeries for primary advanced apical prolapse (stage ≥II) between January 2011 and May 2021 at an academic tertiary hospital. Surgical outcomes and pelvic organ function were evaluated using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitative (POP-Q) stage and validated questionnaires (POPDI-6) during preoperative and postoperative 12-month follow-up evaluations. All data were obtained from electronic medical records. A total of 2368 women underwent surgery for apical prolapse repair, and 18 women underwent either RASH (n = 11) or RASC (n = 7). Compared to the RASC group, the RASH group was significantly younger, premenopausal, and less parous. Preoperative prolapse stage, operative time, estimated blood loss, and hospitalization length was comparable between the groups. No intraoperative complications were observed. All women had a median follow-up duration of 24 months (range: 12-108 months). During the 12-month follow-up period, women in the RASH group reported higher satisfaction with the surgery than those in the RASC group (100% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.137). The mesh exposure rate was significantly higher in the RASC group (3/7, 42.9%) than in the RASH group (0/11, 0%) ( p = 0.043), which was found at 12 to 36 months postoperatively and was successfully managed with vaginal estrogen cream. In the RASH group, one woman required reoperation with anterior colporrhaphy for recurrent anterior prolapse at 60 months postoperatively. The apical success rate was 100% at one year postoperatively, without apical recurrence in either group during the follow-up period. RASH represents an effective and feasible option for the surgical treatment of advanced primary apical prolapse in women who desire uterine preservation and have a significantly lower risk of mesh erosion than RASC.

Cost comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy

Cost comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy

Evaluation of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy videos on YouTube.

To evaluate the quality and reliability of videos on YouTube about robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. YouTube's search function was used to find videos associated with robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. On June 1, 2022, systematic research was performed using the term "robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy". The first 50 videos were included in the study. The quality of the videos was evaluated using the Global Quality Scale (GQS) [a 5-point scale: high quality (4 or 5), acceptable quality (3), low quality (1 or 2)]. The modified DISCERN scale was used to evaluate the reliability of the videos [a 5-point scale: high reliability (5), moderate reliability (3 and 4), low reliability (1 or 2)]. A total of 50 videos associated with robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy were analyzed. The most frequently discussed topics in the videos were the duration of the surgery (72%), the anatomical success rates (70%), the advantages and disadvantages of the procedure compared to the classical methods (68%), and the postoperative complications (60%). The mean GQS of the videos was 3.04 ± 0.75. The mean DISCERN score of the videos was 2.21 ± 1. No appropriate references were cited in any of the videos. There was no video that received a full score (5 points) from DISCERN. Our study shows that the level of quality in YouTube videos associated with robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy is at an acceptable and high level, but its reliability is low. Therefore, short and concise videos that contain accurate information and refer to scientific facts should be prepared by urogynecology associations.

Prevalence and risk factors of lower urinary tract symptoms after robotic sacrocolpopexy

Aims: To analyze the prevalence and risk factors for postoperative lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in women submitted to robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC) for correction of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods: A longitudinal prospective study was carried out on 51 consecutive women who underwent RASC to treat POP. We recorded preoperatively the presence of LUTS urgency, symptomatic stress urinary incontinence (SUI), and voiding difficulty. We also performed an urodynamic study prior to surgical intervention including an incontinence test for overt and occult stress urinary incontinence (with POP reduction). A transobturator suburethral sling (TOT) was implanted in patients with demonstrable urodynamic SUI (overt or occult). Patients' LUTS were reassessed at 6 months after the surgical intervention. McNemar test and the Fisher exact test were used to analyzing dependent variables and Student’s t - test for independent variables. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Results: Postoperative voiding difficulty and symptomatic SUI were significantly reduced. No significant differences were observed in the postoperative prevalence of urgency. The presence of preoperative urinary urgency was the only significant risk factor of postoperative urgency, whereas TOT placement was the only significative factor associated with postoperative symptomatic SUI. TOT placement in patients with occult SUI significantly reduced postoperative Symptomatic SUI. Conclusion: RASC reduces the prevalence of voiding difficulty but not urgency. Concomitant implantation of TOT in patients with preoperative urodynamic SUI (overt or occult) is useful to reduce symptomatic postoperative SUI.

Surgical cost of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a comparison of two robotic platforms.

Robotic assistance in pelvic organ prolapse surgery can improve surgeon ergonomics and instrument dexterity compared with traditional laparoscopy but at increased costs. To compare total costs for robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RSC) between two robotic platforms at an academic medical center. Retrospective cohort of Senhance (Ascensus) RSC between 1/1/2019 and 6/30/21 who were matched 2:1 with DaVinci (Intuitive) RSC. Primary outcome was total costs to hospital system; secondarily we evaluated cost sub-categories. Purchase costs of the robotic systems were not included. T-test, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests were used. A multivariable linear regression was performed to model total costs adjusting for potential confounders. The matched cohort included 75 subjects. The 25 Senhance and 50 DaVinci cases were similar overall, with mean age 60.5±9.7, BMI 27.9±4.7, and parity 2.5±1.0. Majority were white (97.3%) and postmenopausal (86.5%) with predominantly stage III prolapse (64.9%). Senhance cases had longer OR times (Δ=32.1 min, p=0.01). There were no differences in concomitant procedures, intraoperative complications, or short-term postoperative complications between platforms (all p>0.05). On univariable analysis, costs were similar (Senhance $5368.31±1486.89, DaVinci $5741.76±1197.20, p=0.29). Cost subcategories (medications, supplies, etc.) were also similar (all p>0.05). On multivariable linear regression, total cost was $908.33 lower for Senhance (p=0.01) when adjusting for operative time, estimated blood loss, concomitant mid-urethral sling, and use of the GelPoint mini port system. Despite longer operating times, total cost of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy was significantly lower when using the Senhance compared to the DaVinci system.

Postoperative adverse events and re-treatment among patients who have undergone laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse in Japan.

To describe and compare the postoperative adverse events and re-treatment for recurrence after laparoscopic and robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy in Japanese patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). This was a retrospective cohort study using the DeSC database, which contains claims and medical check-up data provided by DeSC Healthcare Inc., Tokyo, Japan. We identified all patients who had undergone either laparoscopic or robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy from April 2014 to May 2021. Patient backgrounds and postoperative outcomes were compared between the laparoscopic and robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy groups. Moreover, the composite adverse event comprising vaginal erosion, postoperative urinary incontinence, postoperative dysuria, urinary tract injury, and abdominal incisional hernia was evaluated. Re-treatment for POP recurrence included pessary use and surgery for POP was also evaluated. Among 28 748 patients diagnosed with POP, 409 (1.4%) had undergone laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and 52 (0.2%) had undergone robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. The prevalence of postoperative adverse events was 20.8% and 13.5% in the laparoscopic and robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy groups, respectively (P= 0.270). One patient (1.9%) underwent surgery after robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy, and none of the patients was administered pessaries postoperatively in both groups. In Japan, postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic and robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy are similar and comparable to those reported in western countries.

De novo pain and relief of pain after abdominal synthetic mesh implants

Introduction:This study assessed the incidence, severity and risk factors for pain after abdominal mesh usage in pelvic floor prolapse surgery. Methods:Prospective observational cohort study (NCT01598467, clinical trials.gov) performed in a tertiary referral center for patients with gynecological prolapse. Women undergoing robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC) or supracervical hysterectomy with sacrocervicopexy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse were​ included (2014–2018). Primary outcome was presence and degree of pre- and postoperative pain. Secondary outcomes were quality of life, dyspareunia and risk factors for postoperative pain. Pre- and postoperative interviews and validated questionnaires were used to assess pain severity and location. A Numeric rating scale (NRS; 0-10; 0 no pain and 10 highest pain score) was included in the questionnaire. ‘De novo pain’, ‘ongoing pain’ and ‘resolved pain’ were respectively described as: Pain solely present postoperatively, pain present both pre- and postoperatively and pain present preoperatively, but resolved postoperatively. The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) and the quality of life Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) were used. Results:115 subjects who underwent abdominal mesh implant surgery were included. Mean follow-up duration was 12.8 3.7 months. The preoperative prevalence of patient self-reported pain was 52%, postoperative self-reported pain was 24%. De novo pain was found in 4.3%. Self-reported ongoing pain was noted in 18%. In 29%of patients the pain had resolved after surgery. Preoperative pain and previous intra-abdominal surgery were identified risk factors for postoperative pain (intra-abdominal surgery OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.2-10.7; preoperative NRS pain score OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.7). Less women reported dyspareunia postoperatively (49% versus 36%). Total PFIQ-7 scores decreased significantly (Total PFIQ-7: -49) postoperatively, indicating improvement in quality of life. Conclusion:Pain is mostly reduced or resolved and less dyspareunia is reported after abdominal pelvic floor surgery with mesh implants for pelvic organ prolapse.

Single-center study for robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacropexies: a one-fits-all strategy for pelvic organ prolapse?

PurposeSarcopenia has been established as the “gold standard” for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Minimal invasive laparoscopy can help to reduce the risks of open access surgery. We compare the surgical results and outcomes of robotic-assisted sacropexies.MethodsIn this monocentric retrospective study we enrolled 49 patients operated on symptomatic POP. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of robotic-assisted sacropexy: patients with a history of hysterectomy received robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RSCP; n = 19), while patients with subtotal hysterectomy received robotic-assisted cervicosacropexy (RCSP; n = 30). Failure was defined as recurrence of the disease with a need for reoperation. Validated questionnaires (the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory—20 (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire—7 (PFIQ-7)), were used for evaluation of patients quality of life postoperatively.ResultsThe comparison between RCSP versus RSCP showed that the latter is related to slightly but not significantly increased recurrence rates and a higher impact of POP symptoms on quality of life in long-term follow-up (p = 0.04). Perioperative data showed similar complication rates in both RSP types but shorter postoperative time of bladder catheterization in the case of RCSP (p = 0.008).ConclusionsThe monocentric long-term data confirm that RSP is a safe and effective method of surgical POP treatment, regardless of the site of the anatomical compartment. In comparison to RSCP, RCSP is associated with a lower impact of POP symptoms on patients’ quality of life with a tendency to slightly lower rates of POP recurrence.

[SHORT-TERM SURGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED SACROCOLPOPEXY IN A SINGLE INSTITUTION].

(Objectives) This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes and functional parameters of lower urinary tract and bowel symptoms in patients who have undergone robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC) due to pelvic organ prolapse. (Patients and methods) This retrospective study included 110 consecutive RASC cases in the urology department of Ageo Central General Hospital, Japan, from November 2020 to October 2021. The medical records of these patients were retrieved. Data on uroflowmetry, post-void residual urine test, and self-administered questionnaires on urination and defecation were assessed. (Results) The mean operating time was 146 min, and the estimated blood loss was 14.8 ml. The intraoperative, postoperative, and severe complication rates of cases classified as Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa or higher were 0%, 9.1%, and 0%, respectively. The maximum flow rate and post-void residual volume of urine significantly improved after the operation. Similarly, the quality of life (QOL) scores and overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), as well as the responses for the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) and Urinary Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6), significantly improved one month after the operation and were sustained for six months. On the other hand, the total scores from the Constipation Scoring System (CSS) and the subscales of the Patient Assessment of Constipation (PAC) -QOL worsened. These scores, except for those of the PAC-QOL satisfaction subscale recovered to the preoperative levels; the PAC-QOL satisfaction subscale scores significantly improved six months postoperatively. The rates of de novo overactive bladder (OAB), stress urinary incontinence (SUI), and constipation one month postoperatively were 8%, 33%, and 10%, respectively. (Conclusions) RASC was performed safely in our institution with acceptable postoperative lower urinary tract and bowel outcomes.