Risk Of Adverse Drug Reactions Research Articles

Proton Pump Inhibitors Induced Hyponatremia in a Liver Transplanted Patient—The Role of Deprescribing: A Case Report and Literature Review

Liver transplant patients are frail subjects due to lifelong therapy with immunosuppressants. In these patients, comorbidity and polytherapy increase the risk of adverse drug reactions. In this study, we report the development of hyponatremia, probably related to pantoprazole in a liver transplant patient. Sertraline dismission and treatment with sodium chloride did not improve clinical symptoms and laboratory levels. Pantoprazole dismission induced an improvement in clinical symptoms and the normalization of sodium levels. A five-month follow-up revealed the absence of clinical symptoms and normal serum sodium levels.

Implementation of a Pilot PharmD Medication Optimization Telehealth Clinic Within a Veterans Affairs System.

Background Patients older than 65 years of age with an anticipated life-expectancy of 12 months or less may have complex medication regimens and an increased risk of adverse drug reactions, and drug-drug interactions. Within the Department of Veterans Affairs, a commonly used medication optimization model is known as the VIONE methodology. Objective This project aimed to pilot implementation of board-certified clinical pharmacist practitioners utilizing the VIONE model within a patient-aligned care team targeting patients 65 years of age and older. Methods The population was identified through the VIONE dashboards. Veteran inclusion criteria included five or more medications, a VIONE risk score of 5 or greater, and CAN scores of greater than 90. The project team reached out via telephone to the patients for a medication regimen review and a 14-day follow-up call. Primary outcomes were quantity of medications discontinued per patient, classes of medications that were discontinued, number and encounter time spent, and cost avoidance over 1 year. Secondary outcomes were VIONE classification of medications, VIONE discontinuation reason, number of recommendations given and accepted by primary provider, and safety analysis. Results There were 53 patients who were successfully contacted via telephone. The top four most discontinued medication classes included 1) vitamins/supplements, 2) ophthalmology medications, 3) gastrointestinal medications, and 4) non-controlled analgesic medications. During the project period the potential cost avoidance over 1 year was $17,716. CONCLUSION: This project demonstrated that usage of VIONE methodology ensures medication optimization with minimal harm and provides significant cost savings in the ambulatory care setting.

Enhancing the Efficacy and Safety of Methotrexate Treatment: A Focus on Drug Interactions (Review)

INTRODUCTION. Methotrexate (MTX) is the main disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) and the gold standard for the safety and efficacy evaluation of biologicals and targeted small molecules. However, its narrow therapeutic range, interpatient variability in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and potential clinically relevant drug–drug interactions (DDIs) may lead to treatment failure and increase the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs).AIM. The study aimed to describe the main clinically significant DDIs associated with MTX used in rheumatic disease therapy and determine possible approaches to addressing this issue based on a literature review.DISCUSSION. MTX is characterised by pharmacokinetic DDIs during absorption, cell penetration, and elimination. Some non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), theophylline, sulfasalazine, antibacterial agents, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) affect MTX elimination and therapeutic effects. The main ADRs associated with MTX include haematotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, lung tissue damage (interstitial pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis), and renal dysfunction. The severity of these ADRs depends on the dose, comorbidities, and concomitant therapy. The toxicity of MTX may be increased by the concomitant administration of medicinal products that exhibit haematotoxicity and affect renal function (impair the elimination of medicines). When co-administering MTX and medicines having clinically significant DDIs described in the literature, healthcare providers should consider the risk factors for each individual patient. The most significant risk factors include moderate to severe renal and hepatic impairment, older age, polypharmacy, and hypoalbuminemia.CONCLUSIONS. This article describes potential clinically significant interactions between MTX and certain NSAIDs, antibacterial agents, and PPIs that depend on individual patient characteristics and may increase the toxicity or decrease the effectiveness of MTX. MTX deprescribing, short-term withdrawal, and dosing optimisation may be considered as approaches to DDI risk mitigation.

Designing a tool ensuring older patients the right medication at the right time after discharge from hospital– the first step in a participatory design process

BackgroundOn average, older patients use five or more medications daily, increasing the risk of adverse drug reactions, interactions, or medication errors. Healthcare sector transitions increase the risk of information loss, misunderstandings, unclear treatment responsibilities, and medication errors. Therefore, it is crucial to identify possible solutions to decrease these risks. Patients, relatives, and healthcare professionals were asked to design the solution they need.MethodsWe conducted a participatory design approach to collect information from patients, relatives, and healthcare professionals. The informants were asked to design their take on a tool ensuring that patients received the correct medication after discharge from the hospital. We included two patients using five or more medications daily, one relative, three general practitioners, four nurses from different healthcare sectors, two hospital physicians, and three pharmacists.ResultsThe patients’ solution was a physical location providing a medication overview, including side effects and interactions. Healthcare professionals suggested different solutions, including targeted and timely information that provided an overview of the patient’s diagnoses, treatment and medication. The common themes identified across all sub-groups were: (1) Overview of medications, side effects, and diagnoses, (2) Sharing knowledge among healthcare professionals, (3) Timely discharge letters, (4) Does the shared medication record and existing communication platforms provide relevant information to the patient or healthcare professional?ConclusionAll study participants describe the need for a more concise, relevant overview of information. This study describes elements for further elaboration in future participatory design processes aimed at creating a tool to ensure older patients receive the correct medication at the correct time.

Pharmacogenomics as a Tool in Addressing Genetic VariationDependent Adverse Drug Reactions

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a cause of discontinuing drug development and withdrawal from market, as well as a very common  source of morbidity and mortality. Genetic variables may be the primary predictor of drug response for certain medications, but they are  estimated to account for 15– 30% of the variability in drug response. Many factors can contribute to adverse drug reactions, including  genetics and drug targeting/delivery. Genetic markers, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in drug-metabolizing enzymes,  drug targets, and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotypes, have been associated with an increased risk of ADRs. Pharmacogenomics is  the study of the genetic variation in the way that different people react to different pharmaceuticals, including variations in the risk of  adverse drug reactions, dose requirements, and efficacy. The implementation of genetic data for predicting responses to medications  and ADRs is becoming a reality in clinical practice, offering the potential to reduce the incidence of ADRs and improve patient outcomes.  As pharmacogenomic research continues to advance, it holds great promise for enhancing drug safety and efficacy, ultimately leading to  more tailored and effective therapeutic interventions. 

Identifying Vulnerabilities to NSAID Adverse Events in the U.S. Population: An Analysis of Preexisting Conditions and Sex.

Purpose: In 2005, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a decision memorandum regarding nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The memorandum recommended the withdrawal of certain NSAIDs due to potential cardiovascular adverse effects. It highlighted the issue of cardiovascular risk associated with NSAIDs as a class. The NSAID medication guide includes a wide range of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), such as increased blood pressure, liver failure, allergic reactions, heart attack, and intestinal bleeding. Although both sexes have an increased risk of ADRs with NSAID use, females have a greater risk than males due to differences in pharmacodynamics and higher medication concentrations (mg/kg). In particular, females with high blood pressure, coronary heart, kidney, and liver disease are at an additional risk of harm from NSAID ADRs. This study quantifies sex-specific differences and other factors associated with prescription NSAID use. Method: The data for this study were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a complex survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in two-year cycles. A survey-weighted logistic regression model was utilized to investigate potential sex differences with prescription NSAIDs in the context of other factors, including kidney disease, hypertension, liver disease, insurance status, coronary heart disease, and age, within the 2011-2018 NHANES survey data. Results: Females reported a slightly higher percentage of high blood pressure and kidney disease than males, while males reported a slightly higher percentage of coronary heart and liver disease than females. Last, the model indicated that females were 58% more likely to have used a prescription NSAID than males. Conclusion: The results confirm that women and people with medical conditions, who would potentially suffer greater harm from NSAID ADRs, are more likely to use a prescription NSAID than individuals without these conditions.

Personalized approach to outpatient management of patients taking tamoxifen by gynecologists

BACKGROUND: 30% of women with luminal breast cancer receiving adjuvant tamoxifen experience disease recurrence within 15 years. This demonstrates the wide variability in clinical response to tamoxifen. Both nongenetic (age, gender, body mass index, duration of drug use) and genetic factors have been described to influence the high variability of response to tamoxifen. Differences in the genes encoding the enzymes CYP2D6, CYP2C, and CYP3A (CYP2D6*4, CYP3A5*3, CYP2C9*2, CYP2C9*3, CYP2C19*2, CYP2C19*3) and the ABCB1 gene (C3435T) may also be the main factors of susceptibility to the occurrence of undesirable effects when taking tamoxifen, which in turn may lead to decreased patient adherence to therapy.
 AIM: The aim of this study was to create a concept and an algorithm for a personalized approach to outpatient management of patients taking tamoxifen by a gynecologist in connection with the carriage of polymorphisms of cytochrome P450 and drug transporter genes.
 MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2017–2018, the outpatient records of 230 patients with breast cancer were analyzed retrospectively. A single-stage pharmacogenetic study of 120 women with stage I–III luminal breast cancer taking tamoxifen was conducted prospectively for the presence of cytochrome P450 gene polymorphisms using the polymerase chain reaction method and assessing associations with adverse drug reactions, and 54 patients were interviewed after five-year follow-up to assess adherence and satisfaction with medical supervision.
 RESULTS: The likelihood of developing endometrial hyperplasia has been shown to increase while taking tamoxifen with increasing average age, body mass index, duration of tamoxifen use, and postmenopause. Significant associations have been identified between the carriage of the CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 gene polymorphisms and the development of adverse drug reactions. Predictive models have been developed to determine the risk of adverse drug reactions. All studied adverse drug reactions associated with various genetic polymorphisms predominated in the group of patients who stopped taking tamoxifen due to poor intolerance. Gynecologists regularly observed 57.4% of patients. Moreover, the higher the adherence to therapy was, the higher was the regularity of observation by a gynecologist.
 CONCLUSIONS: A plan for outpatient management of patients receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy with tamoxifen by a gynecologist has been developed.

Predictive Pharmacogenetic Testing in Psychiatry: Pros and Cons

Pharmacogenetic testing (PGx) is an important diagnostic tool for achieving an optimal balance between the effectiveness and safety of psychotropic drugs, especially those requiring long-term use. The most prescribed medications in psychiatric practice are antipsychotics (APs). Despite the long period of use of APs, their safety profile remains insufficiently high. Due to the high incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), from the central nervous system (CNS) and other organs and tissues of the human body. Therapeutic drug monitoring can help predict and diagnose AP-induced ADRs only if the patient is receiving APs. PGx helps to individually select an AP, its dose and clarify the risk of ADRs before prescribing an AP, or at the start of therapy. This explains the importance of PGx in psychiatrist practice. However, to date, most practicing psychiatrists rarely use predictive PGx or do not use this method. PGx is more often prescribed in the case of a long history of un-successful AP-therapy, or in the case of the development of serious ADRs, the risk of which could be significantly reduced if predictive PGx was used. This case report of PGx in a 56-year-old woman with severe bipolar disorder demonstrates that the trajectory of ADRs and socialization could be significantly improved if this method was prescribed before the initiation of APs, rather than in the event of the development of serious ADRs.

A Genetic Analysis of Current Medication Use in the UK Biobank.

Genomics has been forecasted to revolutionise human health by improving medical treatment through a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of human diseases. Despite great successes of the last decade's genome-wide association studies (GWAS), the results have been translated to genomic medicine to a limited extent. One route to get closer to improved medical treatment could be by understanding the genetics of medication use. Current medication profiles from 335,744 individuals from the UK Biobank were obtained, and a GWAS was conducted to identify common genetic variants associated with current medication use. In total, 59 independent loci were identified for medication use, and approximately 18% of the total variation was attributable to common genetic variation. The largest fraction of genetic variance for current medication use was captured by variants with low-to-medium minor allele frequency, with coding, conserved genomic regions and transcription start sites being enriched for associated variants. The average correlation (R) between medication use and the polygenic score was 0.14. The results further demonstrated that individuals with higher polygenic burden for medication use were, on average, sicker and had a higher risk for adverse drug reactions. These results provide an insight into the genetic contribution of medication use and pave the way for developments of novel multiple trait polygenic scores, which include the genetically informed medication use.

Safety of non-ionic contrast media in CT examinations for out-patients: retrospective multicenter analysis of 473,482 patients.

This study aimed to explore the incidence of and potential risk factors for adverse drug reactions (ADRs) after non-ionic iodinated contrast media (NICM) administration for CT exams in out-patient settings in China. A total of 473,482 out-patients who underwent intravenous NICM between January 1st, 2017, and Dec 31st, 2021, were retrospectively enrolled from three institutions. The occurrence of ADRs and clinical information were recorded. Chi-square test, Poisson regression, and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate potential ADR risk factors and correlation with demographics, season, and NICM type. Among the 473,482 patients (mean age 55.22 ± 14.85; 253,499 male) who received intravenous NICM, the overall ADR incidence was 0.110% (522 of 473,482), with 0.099% acute-related drug reactions (469 of 473,482) and 0.0004% serious ADRs (two of 473,482). Iopromide was associated with a higher risk of acute ADRs. Late ADRs were more frequently observed with iodixanol 320. Multi-level logistic regression of patients with acute ADRs and a control group (matched 1:1 for age, gender, NICM, prescriber department, and institution) showed that summer (adjusted OR = 1.579; p = 0.035) and autumn (adjusted OR = 1.925; p < 0.001) were risk factors of acute ADRs. However, underlying disease and scanned body area were not related to a higher ADR incidence. The use of NICM for out-patients is in general safe with a low ADR incidence. The type of contrast medium (iopromide) and the seasons (summer and autumn) were associated with a higher risk of acute ADRs. Late ADRs were more often observed with iodixanol. In comparison to in-patients, out-patients may be exposed to higher risk due to a lack of extensive risk screening, less nursing care, and higher throughput pressure. Safety data about NICM from a large population may complement guidelines and avoid ambiguity. • The incidence and risk factors for adverse events after using non-ionic iodinated contrast media are complex in out-patients. • Non-ionic iodinated contrast media are safe for out-patients and the overall incidence of adverse drug reactions was 0.110%. • There is a higher risk of acute adverse drug reactions in summer and autumn.

Adverse reactions induced by MDT/WHO (Rifampicin+Clofazimine+Dapsone) and ROM (Rifampicin+Ofloxacin+Minocycline) regimens used in the treatment of leprosy: a cohort study in a National Reference Center in Brazil.

Background: Recommended standard treatment for leprosy is multidrugtherapy (MDT/WHO), consisting Rifampicin+Dapsone+Clofazimine. Other medications are recommended in cases of resistance, adverse reactions and intolerances, including ROM regimen, Rifampicin+Ofloxacin+Minocycline. Therefore, pharmacovigilance is an important tool in understanding these adverse drug reactions (ADRs), supporting pharmacotherapy management and medication safety. This study seeks to evaluate ADRs comparing two therapeutic regimens, MDT and ROM, used in treatment of patients with leprosy, analyzing prognostic factors regarding risk and safety. Methods:A retrospective cohort study was performed by assessing medical records of 433 patients diagnosed with leprosy from 2010 to 2021 at a National Reference Center in Brazil. They were subject to 24months or more of treatment with MDT or ROM regimens. ADR assessments were analyzed by two experienced researchers, who included clinical and laboratory variables, correlating them with temporality, severity and the causality criteria of Naranjo and WHO. Results: The findings observed an average of 1.3 reactions/patient. Out of individuals experiencing reactions, 67.0% (69/103) were utilizing MDT/MB, while 33.0% (34/103) were using ROM. The median time for ADR of 79days for MDT and 179days for ROM. In first reaction, Dapsone was the most frequently involved medication; the most affected system was hematopoietic. As compared to Clofazimine, results indicated that use of Dapsone was associated with 7% increased risk of ADR occurrence (HR: 1.07; p = 0.866). Additionally, Rifampicin was linked to 31% increased risk of ADRs (HR: 1.31; p = 0.602); and Ofloxacin showed 35% elevated risk (HR: 1.35; p = 0.653). Conversely, results for Minocycline indicated 44% reduction in the risk of ADRs (HR: 0.56; p = 0.527), although statistical significance was not reached. The use of MDT conferred 2.51 times higher risk of developing ADRs in comparison to ROM. Conclusion: The comparison between MDT and ROM revealed that MDT caused more ADRs, and these reactions were more severe, indicating less safety for patients. Dapsone was the most common medication causing ADRs, followed by Rifampicin. The combination with Clofazimine was associated with an additional risk of ADRs, warranting further studies to confirm this hypothesis. Given the high magnitude of ADRs, healthcare teams need to monitor patients undergoing leprosy treatment with focus on pharmacovigilance.

HFpEF and sex: understanding the role of sex differences.

Heart failure is a complex clinical syndrome with many etiological factors and complex pathophysiology affecting millions worldwide. Males and females can have distinct clinical presentation and prognosis, and there is an emerging understanding of the factors that highlight the similarities and differences to synthesize and present available data for sex-specific differences in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). While the majority of data demonstrate more similarities than differences between females and males in terms of heart failure, there are key differences. Data showed that females have a higher risk of developing HFpEF, but a lower risk of mortality and hospitalization. This can be conditioned by different profiles of comorbidities, postmenopausal changes in sex hormone levels, higher levels of inflammation and chronic microvascular dysfunction in females. These factors, combined with different left ventricular dimensions and function, which are more pronounced with age, lead to a higher prevalence of LV diastolic dysfunction at rest and exercise. As a result, females have lower exercise capacity and quality of life when compared to males. Females also have different activities of systems responsible for drug transformation, leading to different efficacy of drugs as well as higher risk of adverse drug reactions. These data prove the necessity for creating sex-specific risk stratification scales and treatment plans.

Can you name that tablet? A cross-sectional study on recognition of common urology medications.

Clinicians frequently rely on patients to accurately tell them what prescription medications and doses they are taking in outpatient visits. This information is essential to monitor the efficacy of a medication and to determine any adverse interactions. This study aimed to assess urologist and urology trainee's visual recognition of common urology medications. An online survey was distributed to urologists and urology trainees in Ireland. Images of 11 commonly prescribed urological medications were presented with free text options for answering. Information was gathered on respondent's role and experience. Data was analysed using STATA version 17. The survey had a 90% response rate from 50 distributions. Respondents' roles were consultant (31.1%), specialist registrar (33.3%), registrar (22.2%), senior house officer (11.1%) and intern (2.2%). Forty six percenthad more than six years urology experience. Average rate of correct responses was 39.4% ± 23.9. The most accurate group were consultants (46.1% ± 22.1), followed by specialist registrars (41.2% ± 24.9), registrars (39.1% ± 26.8), senior house officers (21.8% ± 10.4) and interns (9.1% ± 0). The most and least recognised medications were sildenafil (Viagra©) (84.4%) and fesoterodine (Toviaz©) (11.1%), respectively. Just 28.9% of respondents had previously handled any of the medications listed. Patients often do not reliably know their own medications other than to describe them or show an unpackaged tablet. Prescribing safety is paramount to ensuring patient safety and reducing the risk of adverse drug reactions. This study shows that even experienced clinicians do not recognise the medications they regularly prescribe, and decisions should not be made without accurate medication reconciliation.

RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF THE PATIENT-REPORTED ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS IN AN ITALIAN ALLERGY UNIT: ALLERG-RAF STUDY.

The Italian Medicines Agency indicates that about 5% of hospital admissions are due to Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs). Several factors are recognized to be associated with an increased risk for ADRs, such as the female gender and polytherapy. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the suspected ADRs reported by patients during the anamnestic interview at the Allergy Unit. ALLERG-RAF study is a retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients evaluated in the Allergy Unit of ASST Spedali Civili and University of Brescia from 2000 to 2016. The inclusion criteria were age >18 years and medical consultation requested for suspected ADRs. Data relating to the patient's intrinsic characteristics, the drug supposed to be the cause and the prescribed pharmacological therapy were collected. Pseudonymized data from each patient were collected in an informatics database. From 2000 to 2016, 35817 accesses to the Allergy Unit were made and 2171 unique events related to a suspected ADR were collected in 1840 patients. More than two thirds of the reports concerned females (70.4%). Antibiotics were involved in the majority of the self-reported suspected ADRs (48.7%), particularly beta-lactams (61.1%). Anti-inflammatory drugs, mainly NSAIDs, were second in incidence and suspected in 25.2% of reports. As a site of ADR manifestation, most of the reported reactions involve the skin. No clinical sequelae were reported. Our results underline the importance of patient reporting in Pharmacovigilance. Furthermore, gender gap data emphasizes the importance of the gender-specific medicine approach.

The Incidence Side Effects of Antihypertensive Drugs in the Intensive Care Unit General Hospital Dr.M.Ddjamil Padang

To lower morbidity and mortality from disease complications, the goal of hypertension treatment is to maintain target blood pressure. The management of hypertension necessitates lifelong medication, which carries the risk of adverse drug reactions. This study attempts to ascertain the occurrence of antihypertensive drug side effects and the description of antihypertensive drug use in Dr. M. Djamil Padang Hospital's Intensive Care Unit based on the Naranjo algorithm. Using cross-sectional methodology and retrospective data, this study is an example of non-experimental descriptive research. 60 patients met the inclusion criteria according to the study's findings. The most utilized medicines were those in the Calcium channel blocker (CCB) class. The incidence of side effects was found to be 18 patients (55 different types of pharmaceuticals) in the moderately likely category and 1 patient (2 different types of drugs) in the uncertain category based on the Naranjo algorithm. The side effects that caused more than 10% were edema (12.28%), hypotension (38%), cough (15.78%), and hyponatremia (14.03%). Chest pain (8.77%), shortness of breath (5.26%), nausea, and vomiting (5.26%) were the side effects that manifested &lt;10%. Antihypertensive medication side effects remain in the Central General Hospital (RSUP), Dr. M. Djamil Padang's Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

Exploring the level of agreement among different drug-drug interaction checkers: a comparative study on direct oral anticoagulants

ABSTRACT Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be involved in drug–drug interactions (DDIs) potentially increasing the risk of adverse drug reactions. This study aimed to evaluate the level of agreement among interaction checkers (ICs) and DOACs’ summary of product characteristics (SPCs), in listing DDIs and in attributing DDIs’ severity. Research design and methods The level of agreement among five ICs (i.e. INTERCheck WEB, Micromedex, Lexicomp, Epocrates, and drugs.com) in identifying potential DDIs and in attributing severity categories was evaluated using Gwet’s AC1 on all five ICs and by comparing groups of four- and two-pair sets of ICs. Results A total of 486 potentially interacting drugs with dabigatran, 556 for apixaban, 444 for edoxaban, and 561 for rivaroxaban were reported. The level of agreement among the ICs in identifying potential DDIs was poor (range: 0.12–0.16). Similarly, it was low in 4 and 2 sets analyses. The level of agreement among the ICs in classifying the severity of potential DDIs was poor (range: 0.32–0.34), also in 4 and 2 sets analyses. Conclusions The heterogeneity among different ICs and SPCs underscores the need to standardize DDI datasets and to conduct real-world studies to generate evidence regarding the frequency and clinical relevance of potential DOAC-related DDIs.

Factors Contributing to Negative Outcomes Associated with Medications and Drug-Related Problems in Kidney Replacement Therapy-A Hospital-Based Prospective Observational Study.

Negative outcomes associated with medications (NOM) and drug-related problems (DRP) significantly impact individuals with kidney replacement therapy (KRT) given the complexities of managing kidney disease and associated comorbidities. The present study aims to assess the frequency of NOMs/DRPs among KRT patients and identify contributing factors. A cross-sectional study was conducted at Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital (Granada, Spain), involving 117 outpatient adults with KRT. Data were collected from February 2021 to July 2023 using electronic records, semi-structured interviews (Dáder Method), and discussions with nephrology specialists. NOMs/DRPs were identified following treatment guidelines. Binary logistic regression was used to determine associated factors (p-value < 0.05). Across 117 patients, 2436 NOMs and 3303 DRPs were identified, averaging 20.82 NOMs and 28.23 DRPs per patient. Prevalent NOMs included untreated conditions (58.95%), quantitative ineffectiveness (35.43%), and non-quantitative safety problems (5.13%). Dominant DRPs were undertreated conditions (37.63%), wrong dose/posology/length (33.00%), risk of adverse drug reactions (ADR) (16.14%), and non-adherence (6.87%). Patients with ADR, undertreated conditions, and anemia were associated with quantitative ineffectiveness. Risk of ADR and vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency correlated with non-quantitative safety problems. KRT patients exhibited a substantial prevalence of NOMs/DRPs. Further research is needed to deepen our understanding of these complexities for improved patient care.

Forensic investigation on a combined death by food aspiration and acute escitalopram intoxication occurred to a psychiatric subject in a nursing home.

Food aspiration is one of the major health risks for elderly people in nursing homes which could lead to death. Moreover, misconducts in pharmacotherapy may represent a potential risk of adverse drug reactions. It is reported here the toxicological evaluation of a combined death by food aspiration and acute escitalopram intoxication of a psychiatric subject, occurred in a nursing home. An 89-year-old man, suffering from dysphagia and Alzheimer's, was resident in a nursing home. He was fed with a liquid diet administered directly in mouth using a syringe. The man was also being treated with escitalopram 10mg tablet. One evening, after receiving the meal in the usual way, the man complained of sudden illness. Carried to the emergency room, the man died about 3h later with a diagnosis of cardiogenic shock subsequentially to ab ingestis. The histological findings revealed the presence of exogenous material, probably food, up to the finest bronchial branches. The toxicological examination revealed the presence of escitalopram and its main metabolite, desmethylcitalopram: in the blood 1972ng/ml and 285ng/ml, in the brain 4657ng/g and 1025ng/g, in the gastric content 2317ng/g and 423ng/g, in the lung 21,771ng/g and 468ng/g, respectively. The bad practice of the nurses to dissolve the escitalopram tablet in the liquefied food and to administer the therapy with a syringe directly into the mouth emerged thanks this investigation. Following food aspiration, escitalopram was absorbed by inhalation route, reaching high concentrations in blood and tissues. The death occurred due to a combined mechanism between food aspiration and the escitalopram toxic action.

Assessing Pharmacokinetic Correlates of Escitalopram-Related Adverse Drug Reactions.

To assess the pharmacokinetic correlates of reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) under antidepressant treatment with escitalopram (ESC) using a large therapeutic drug monitoring database. A large naturalistic sample of inpatients and outpatients prescribed ESC was analyzed. ADRs were classified using the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser side effect rating scale. We compared ESC-treated patients with (n = 35) and without ADRs (n = 273) using ESC plasma concentrations as the primary outcome. We also compared ADR rates in the 2 groups based on 2 cut-off ESC levels reflecting the recommended upper thresholds of the therapeutic reference range of 80 ng/mL, suggested by the consensus therapeutic drug monitoring guidelines, and 40 ng/mL, based on recent meta-analysis data. The effects of age, sex, smoking, daily ESC dose, plasma concentrations, and concentrations corrected for daily dose were included in a binary logistic regression model to predict ADRs. No differences in clinical, demographic, or pharmacokinetic parameters were observed between patients with and without ADRs ( P > 0.05). Patients with ESC-related ADRs were more frequently diagnosed with psychotic disorders than those without (25% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.004). None of the variables was associated with ADR risk. Overall, ADR rates were not significantly different in patients above versus below thresholds of ESC concentrations (ESC concentrations >40 [n = 59] vs. ≤40 ng/mL [n = 249] and >80 [n = 8] vs. ≤80 ng/mL [n = 300]; P = 0.56 and P = 1.0, respectively). No distinct pharmacokinetic patterns underlying ESC-associated ADRs were observed. Further studies with more specific assessments of ADRs in larger cohorts are required to better identify potential underlying patterns.

Development of Smart Pill Expert System Based on IoT

AbstractAn improved version of the smart pill expert system known as SPEC 2.0 is presented in this paper to give a knowledge of IoT in healthcare. At the designated moment, the system strives to accurately dispense the recommended dosage of medication. The user-friendly interface of SPEC 2.0 is one of its standout features since it makes it simple for people of all ages to utilize among all the smart medicine dispensers. The main objective of this system is to deliver control and monitoring capabilities via an android application, free of in-app purchases or subscriptions. Numerous features, including the capacity to send alerts and SMS messages regarding pill distribution, are included in the android application. With the help of this tool, users can keep on schedule with their medicine and receive frequent reminders. In order to successfully manage the issue of overdosage, the system lays a special emphasis on preventing the consumption of medication in excess amounts. Users of SPEC 2.0 can reduce their risk of adverse drug reactions by following the directions for dose intervals. Daily tests have been conducted to ensure that SPEC 2.0 works as intended, and thorough records have been kept of each test. These tests offer important information about the system's dependability and its capacity to deliver precise drug dosages on a regular basis. In conclusion, the improved smart pill expert system reveals its potential to dramatically increase medicine adherence and avoid any health concerns brought on by ingesting the wrong dosage.